Gene Wolfe Fans Talk Politics (Again)

brunians at brunians.org · 19 May 2009, 22:05 · from 2009-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 18:05:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) Gene Wolfe Fans Talk Politics (Again)
In-Reply-To: <7128DCCE-0E7C-4291-A0FA-D5855BC96A02 at io.com>
References: <mailman.68838.1242757770.12296.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net><4A1304A1.1000901 at verizon.net><13409.67.142.130.18.1242761222.squirrel at brunians.org><2BCC6FAA-905B-4A04-BFAE-817E0EDE9BD8 at io.com><10067.67.142.130.18.1242765830.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<1f7617370905191348w255b5f18ic401923d2afbf8d5 at mail.gmail.com>
	<A4856B7AE169481895905D4F0A93C320@eMachinePC>
	<80BACAF9-E5FD-4DF0-8A62-A1091E66E3D4 at io.com>
	<15887.67.142.130.18.1242767952.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<2B016B21-C372-4918-9B46-4860CE2E5DAE at io.com>
	<1401.67.142.130.18.1242768973.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<113560E2-E507-413C-A901-BB9F39294E35 at io.com>
	<11399.67.142.130.18.1242770216.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<7128DCCE-0E7C-4291-A0FA-D5855BC96A02 at io.com>
Message-ID: <2352.67.142.130.18.1242770756.squirrel at brunians.org>

Reality is what doesn't go away when you stop believing in it.

-- PKD (I think).

.

> On May 19, 2009, at 4:56 PM, brunians at brunians.org wrote:
>
>> I calls them like I sees them. I prefer to look straight at things and
>> name them plainly, rather than search for more comforting, euphemistic
>> ways to express plain reality.
>
> Ah, but here is our fundamental disagreement: I don't think
> "extortion" is any closer to "plain reality" than "dues."
>
> I am, in fact, arguing that the reverse is true.  But then I believe
> we probably, at heart, disagree on "plain reality."
>
> Adam
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net