Gene Wolfe Fans Talk Politics (Again)
James Wynn · 20 May 2009, 00:30
· from 2009-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:30:21 -0500 Subject: (urth) Gene Wolfe Fans Talk Politics (Again) In-Reply-To: <6A6E9DB2-F98D-4FB2-B783-95A98F2FC944 at io.com> References: <mailman.68838.1242757770.12296.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net><4A1304A1.1000901 at verizon.net><13409.67.142.130.18.1242761222.squirrel at brunians.org><2BCC6FAA-905B-4A04-BFAE-817E0EDE9BD8 at io.com><D67BBCB673F4491BB8DC3A37289BD563@eMachinePC><002BF131-691F-4247-B56E-19C9D86BDA6D at io.com><50586EEE2CA14862AA7A038867E0B211@eMachinePC><9ABFD473-EF4F-44FA-8C53-9A140080E64F at io.com><2D85DC7E1002442C9FFC385EBA1BB3A0@eMachinePC><F692D3D3-5B04-432A-B757-4DDDECFD95F8 at io.com><BD4FACD5AAA943568DAC238C1E3F3911@eMachinePC> <6A6E9DB2-F98D-4FB2-B783-95A98F2FC944 at io.com> Message-ID: <1D9B3EF2ED3D43EC8B1949D8D73BE040@eMachinePC> >Adam opines > Should Moe pay for half the well? I don't know. What's the benefit to > him of building the well at all? What are the downsides to him if the > well is not built? Should the well's costs be recouped through a > per-liter charge on its usage, with the costs repaid to the financiers of > the project, or is it actually going to be presented as a common good? If > the latter, how much does Moe value his participation in the society that > he and his neighbors constitute? If the answer is "not that much," does > he get to be sad if he then has to provide his own fire protection if he > withdraws from their society? We don't have to consider those things. Neither does Moe. We are more numerous than Moe. We're not negotiating with Moe. If Moe complains we'll denounce him as greedy and do what we want anyway. Moe can bend over and take the shaft. >> It assumes that a guy making $25K a year is exactly like the guy making >> $250K a year except that one happens to make less. > > Yes and no. I mean, sure, there is a reason I eventually started getting > paid more money: I was doing jobs that required skills that were rarer, > or at least more valued by the people willing to employ me, and I had > acquired those skills through experience and training. But on the other > hand, I'm still in some important sense the me I was twenty years ago. You are not the same person at $60K that you were when you made $15K. You have skills that you were motivated to develop in order to earn more. You have a history of steady, reliable work that you were motivated to create out of a desire for money (not a desire for a better "public space"). Stop and consider that you are currently making more than the mean salary in this country. That didn't just fall in your lap. What if society were engineered so you could depend on making say...$25K per year from the get go, and start taxing you more as you progress. There's a good chance your work history would be vastly different. Your claim that your 25% of $60K is less than 15% of $15K suggests you think you're being over-paid. But consider that you perspective might be colored by the fact that you paid no income tax when you made $15K, and now that you make $60K, depending on your situation, you probably pay little or none as well. Someone else is making up that difference for you. Are you proud of that? On the other hand, from then til now you almost certainly paid a significant Social Security **flat tax**. What is not readily apparent is that your employer pays it as well. Making the cost of just hiring you and your fellow employees to be the largest expense they've taken on--which is passed on you as a consumer. Your welfare state is a self-justifying system, since it makes it more expensive just to get started in life and makes jobs harder to find. J.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net