(no subject)

Jordon Flato · 22 May 2009, 18:53 · from 2009-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jordonflato at gmail.com (Jordon Flato)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:53:50 -0700
Subject: (urth) Fw: Re: (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <43975.1243018181 at butcherbaker.org>
References: <43975.1243018181 at butcherbaker.org>
Message-ID: <273409710905221153y40f807ffkdbe2483804c7b353 at mail.gmail.com>

Aquarius has a pretty big selection I think.  Tell them Jordon sent you.

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:49 AM, <sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org> wrote:

>
> does anyone know where to get used mp3s?
>
> ~witz
>
>
> On Wed May 20 17:44 , Adam Thornton sent:
>
> On May 20, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Stuart Hamm wrote:
>
> No one's gonna back me?? Don't we all rush out and buy a first edition of
> GW's new books instead of downloading an illegal copy???
>
>
> Yeah.
>
> My own position is that downloading media illegally is some-kind-of-bad
> (me, I still prefer to buy physical CDs and then rip them to iTunes, so that
> I have unprotected files which I can then copy to whatever music player I
> may have in the future that might not be an iPod), but it's not exactly
> *theft*.  Copyright infringement is not, in my mind, the same crime as, say,
> stealing your TV.
>
> I do not, however, think there's a one-to-one correspondence between lost
> sales and illegal downloads.  That is, plenty of people download things that
> they're idly curious about, but nowhere near enough interested in to buy.
>  Now, one can, quite correctly, make the point that they SHOULDN'T OUGHTA BE
> USING IT then.  Fair enough.
>
> But mainly I was just bringing it up as a counterpoint to Brunians'
> absolutist Property Rights statement, by pointing out that there are some
> things which some people consider legitimate property rights, and others do
> not.
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20090522/0e3328ae/attachment-0001.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net