Silk for calde blog: Wolfe thesis
Jerry Friedman · 22 Sep 2009, 14:44
· from 2009-September.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: jerry_friedman at yahoo.com (Jerry Friedman)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) Silk for calde blog: Wolfe thesis
In-Reply-To: <3306B551-9B74-41C4-A201-76CE02ADEAF7 at optusnet.com.au>
Message-ID: <57247.88837.qm at web50703.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
--- On Tue, 9/22/09, Zachary Kendal <zackendal at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On 22/09/2009, at 3:34 PM, Jerry
> Friedman wrote:
>
> > --- On Mon, 9/21/09, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:26 PM,
> >> Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Seems like a worthwhile thesis, although I wonder
> whether
> >> those 2
> >> priest archetypes are quite so universal - such a
> >> categorization would
> >> have difficulty with Frank Herbert, I think.
> >>
> >>
> >> ... and Arthur Clarke ("The Star")
> >
> > It's been a long time, but I have the impression the
> > narrator's faith was shaken, not stirred.
> >
> > Do the priests or monks in "The Nine Billion Names of
> > God" count?
> >
> >> ... and Dan
> >> Simmons (Hyperion) ... and Mary Doria Russell (The
> Sparrow)
> >> ... and Peter F. Hamilton (the Night's Dawn
> trilogy) ...
> >> and Walter M. Miller (A Canticle for Leibowitz)
> ... and Tony
> >> Boucher ("The Quest for St. Aquin") ... and ...
> >
> > You've got some points there (as best I remember
> those
> > books and stories).
> >
> >> The makings of at least one excellent doctoral
> thesis lies
> >> in the image of the (Catholic) priest in SF.
> However, this
> >> person's thesis ain't it.
> >
> > Definitely not, if I'm right in thinking this is an
> > undergrad thesis.? However, hope is a virtue, I'm
> told.
> > Maybe he'll get out of his stereotypes by doing the
> > research.
> >
> > Jerry Friedman
>
> Ouch!
I'm sorry I caused you to say that. I would defend my
use of "stereotypes", but after your clarification, it
seems pointless.
> But I should probably introduce myself before taking
> up my own defence: Hi, I'm Zac, and, yes, I'm doing a thesis
> on Gene Wolfe. I know I really should have introduced myself
> earlier - before my blog became a topic of discussion (you
> couldn't have known I was lurking around the Urth mailing
> list) - but I was a little intimidated by how much everyone
> here seems to know about Wolfe's work.
>
> Anyway, I'll re-post here what I wrote on my blog in
> defence of my thesis topic (slightly edited to fit this
> context):
...
> "I should have been clearer in my original post, but these
> crude 'stereotypes' are what I *currently* have the
> impression are dominant. I gather, from the limited research
> I have already done, that most SF with priests as
> protagonists (not peripheral or minor characters) either use
> the priest to challenge (or shake or debunk) the priest's
> faith, or to have it reaffirmed. These two categories are,
> of course, generalisations.
>
> "I *plan* to argue that Wolfe finds a middle ground between
> these two *dominant* approaches to the priest. That he
> manages to do both debunk *and* affirm aspects of
> Catholicism (ritual vs. spiritual?). I do not plan to argue
> that no other author has ever done the same and challenged
> these two approaches.
>
> "Thank you very much for your recommended texts - I'm
> currently in the process of planning my summer reading,
Speaking of stereotypes, I thought, "Summer reading?
Isn't this due in 2010? Oh. Never mind."
> "It may also have been unclear in my post that this is an
> undergraduate thesis - a 15,000 word thesis that I will do
> in 2010 for my honours degree (we do things differently in
> Australia, I think).
...
Undergrad theses are known here in America--I wrote one.
(I trust yours well be better than mine was.)
> I realise that it is not very fair that I was reading these
> posts without your knowing, and I apologise.
I hope that was irony. We all know people lurk on
mailing lists, and you linked to this list at your site,
so there's nothing to apologize for. I don't know
whether I need to apologize for using a less harsh word
at your blog than I did here--no harm was done by my
two faces, since you saw both.
> I would warmly
> welcome any constructive criticism that anyone might have.
You're in the right place.
> I
> am passionate about Wolfe's writing, and have been wanting
> to write on his work since I started my degree.
Still in the right place.
Anyway, best of luck with this project!
Jerry Friedman
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net