Silk for calde blog: Wolfe thesis

Adam Thornton · 22 Sep 2009, 15:39 · from 2009-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: adam at io.com (Adam Thornton)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:39:48 -0500
Subject: (urth) Silk for calde blog: Wolfe thesis
In-Reply-To: <3306B551-9B74-41C4-A201-76CE02ADEAF7 at optusnet.com.au>
References: <370421.87684.qm at web50705.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
	<3306B551-9B74-41C4-A201-76CE02ADEAF7 at optusnet.com.au>
Message-ID: <0B1704BE-B464-4041-BCD9-A6D8D8C03055 at io.com>

On Sep 22, 2009, at 3:32 AM, Zachary Kendal wrote:

> "I should have been clearer in my original post, but these crude  
> 'stereotypes' are what I *currently* have the impression are  
> dominant. I gather, from the limited research I have already done,  
> that most SF with priests as protagonists (not peripheral or minor  
> characters) either use the priest to challenge (or shake or debunk)  
> the priest's faith, or to have it reaffirmed. These two categories  
> are, of course, generalisations.
>
> "I *plan* to argue that Wolfe finds a middle ground between these  
> two *dominant* approaches to the priest. That he manages to do both  
> debunk *and* affirm aspects of Catholicism (ritual vs. spiritual?).  
> I do not plan to argue that no other author has ever done the same  
> and challenged these two approaches.

To apply a slightly different crude overgeneralization: if you're  
making a priest a major figure, then there's presumably a *reason* for  
that choice, and that reason has something to do with his being a  
priest, rather than, say, a fat guy, or a redhead.

At which point, you're probably committed to doing *something* with  
his faith.  Shaking (perhaps to death) and reaffirming are the two  
obvious things to do.

I suppose this wouldn't be true in a book where *everyone* (or at  
least, many of the major characters) are clergy and therefore the  
difference is in particulars of theology rather than being-a-priest-or- 
not.  For examples of this, _Name of the Rose_, _Endymion_, and  
_Anathem_ all come to mind.

Something I'd *really* like to see someone play with is: why is such a  
large proportion of religion-oriented SF Catholic?  If it reflects the  
background of the authors, then why are Catholics overrepresented in  
SF authorship (and, concomitantly, why are there relatively few Jewish  
SF stories) ?  I mean, just off the top of my head:

_A Canticle for Leibowitz_, _A Case of Conscience_ (which really is  
dire), _Hyperion/Endymion_, "The Star", much of Wolfe's work.   
Where's, for example, the Lutheran SF?  (If I were being snarky I'd  
ask and answer where the Baptist SF was.)  Or even specifically  
*Protestant* Christian SF?

Adam

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net