Wizard-Knight sucks, or, is there any scholarly research on it?

brunians at brunians.org · 10 Nov 2009, 02:43 · from 2009-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:43:32 -0500 (EST)
Subject: (urth) Wizard-Knight sucks, or,
 is there any scholarly research on it?
In-Reply-To: <cbf55b100911091559v3655cf59kfb71ae823bbb197e at mail.gmail.com>
References: <cbf55b100911091559v3655cf59kfb71ae823bbb197e at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7317.67.142.130.47.1257821012.squirrel at brunians.org>

I thought Wizard-Knight was excellent.

.

> http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091108215604AAFwQWS
>
> I don't know whether to be more chagrined or amused at him. (I thought
> of resurrecting my Yahoo account and telling him he'd've to pay for
> the only scholarly work or spend several days reading through
> urth.net.) I didn't think _The Knight_ was that bad, although I didn't
> enjoy it nearly as much as _New Sun_ or _Cerberus_.
>
> --
> gwern
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net