The Guild's Revolutionary

David Duffy · 24 Nov 2009, 04:54 · from 2009-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: David.Duffy at qimr.edu.au (David Duffy)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:54:29 +1000 (EST)
Subject: (urth) The Guild's Revolutionary
In-Reply-To: <061068913F22422BA90CE4A6AAC01641@eMachinePC>
References: <mailman.1.1258841747.28662.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net><4B086F89.10809 at verizon.net><84D73864-A63A-4CC8-AD9F-CF9C7B400D25 at io.com><CB1CCF052BBA41FABC5DAC6EE841F2BE@eMachinePC><Pine.LNX.4.64.0911241304150.15716 at orpheus.qimr.edu.au>
	<061068913F22422BA90CE4A6AAC01641@eMachinePC>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911241444300.19994 at orpheus.qimr.edu.au>

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, James Wynn wrote:

>>> not much supporting it beyond Utlan's blindness. Borges is a great writer, 
>>> but other than "The Book of Imaginary Beings" which cites the Baldanders, 
>>> I haven't noted much influence from him. Of course, that might be due to a 
>>> deficiency in my Borges knowledge.
>> 
>> Father Inire echoes "The Book of Imaginary Beings" section on fauna of 
>> mirrors.
>> 
>> Borges has:
>> "the Fish was a shifting and shining creature that nobody had ever caught 
>> but that many said they had glimpsed in the depths of mirrors...The first 
>> to awaken will be the Fish. Deep in the mirror we will perceive a very 
>> faint line and the color of this line will be like no other color."
>
> Look, I'm not saying Wolfe hasn't read Borges, nor even that he doesn't like 
> him. Nor that he hasn't drawn from The Book of Imaginary Beings. I know he 
> has (even though he has apparently disparaged that little book somewhat).

I was just addressing:

"I haven't noted much influence from him."

> I'm 
> speaking specifically of Master Ultan. It's a cool little concept to say "Oh, 
> Wolfe had Borges play that role." It'd be neat to find all my favorite 
> authors on Urth. But if Ultan wasn't blind, no one would identify him with 
> Borges either by his looks or words.  And so essentially the argument is that 
> Ultan=Borges because Ultan is a blind librarian. But Palaemon is blind too, 
> right? Who is he? So where is Vance? Don't you think he deserves to be here? 
> Or Chesterton?

One might argue that the choice of a fantastical South America is due
to reading Borges, rather than Chesterton or Vance.  And how would one
recognize the latter two, as opposed to a blind librarian in a labyrinthine
library?

But yes, I would agree that there are no completely definitive 
clues to identifying models for anyone in the books. Even Neil Armstrong ;)

Cheers, David Duffy.
-- 
| David Duffy (MBBS PhD)                                         ,-_|\
| email: davidD at qimr.edu.au  ph: INT+61+7+3362-0217 fax: -0101  /     *
| Epidemiology Unit, Queensland Institute of Medical Research   \_,-._/
| 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia  GPG 4D0B994A v

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net