Agia: Thief?
Mark Millman · 16 Oct 1998, 14:14
· from urth-v0020.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Mark Millman" <Mark_Millman at hmco.com> Subject: Re: (urth) Agia: Thief? Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 14:14:39 Message-ID: <urth-v0020-0049 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0020/0049.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16 October 1998 at 5:00 PM GMT, Robert Borski wrote: > Re Agia as the Claw's thief. I've already > stated I find this difficult to accept, and > wonder what mantis or other proponents > of the Agia-as-thief theory make of the > following scene in SWORD. Sev wants > the Claw back from the cacogens, and > Barbatus asks, "If it is yours, where did > you get it?" Sev lays his Agia theory on > him, but Barbatus seems almost incensed > by this. "All this is speculation. You did not > see this jewel upon the altar, nor did you > feel the woman's hand when she gave it to > you, if in fact she did. _Where did you get > it?_" (p. 271, and these are Wolfe's italics, > not mine.) > > Baldander's answer to the same question > --'I got it from the drawer in a table'--also > does not seem to satisfy Barbatus, and > not much later Famulimus says to Sev, as > they're walking to their timeship, "Though > you did not now pass our test..." > > It seems to me that passing "the test" > somehow involves correctly answering > the question, "Where did you get it?" What > think you? I'm not convinced that the literal question "Where did you get it?" is really at issue for Famulimus and Bar- batus here. I think it's the only way that they can ask the real question without giving away the answer; if Severian knows the answer, then the phrasing won't throw him off, but if he doesn't have a clue (as he, in fact, proves he hasn't), then he'll try to answer it as it stands. Any physical answer--"Agia planted it", "it was in the drawer", even "well, it just appeared there one day"--is going to be incorrect. The correct answer is something like, "It's a part of me." But as Severian doesn't yet recognize this, he can't pass the test. Remember also that the Pelerines search Agia be- cause she looks guilty to them, and don't bother with Severian because he appears plainly to be an innocent. There's more to it than just appearances, too; if I recall correctly, mention is made of the chief Pelerine's (is she a Mother Superior?) ability to see the truth regardless of circumstance. > Re: EMPIRES OF FOLIAGE AND > FLOWERS. I have a copy of the > non-deluxe edition I'll let go for $175.00. > It is a nice book, but perhaps too much > so--I'm afraid to handle it, fearing finger- > prints or drool may soil it. Drool, Robert? If you love the book that much, I'm surprised that you're willing to let it go at all. > Robert Borski Mark Millman *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net