Silk for calde blog: Wolfe thesis

James Wynn · 21 Dec 2009, 11:57 · from 2009-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:57:21 -0600
Subject: (urth) Silk for calde blog: Wolfe thesis
In-Reply-To: <1f7617370912201816w3b0a7c57j9a9d476afb3d404f at mail.gmail.com>
References: <769545.6506.qm at web180207.mail.gq1.yahoo.com><f3417623efce6425e249ac17c874a333.squirrel at webmail.prismnet.com><15361.67.142.130.29.1261177950.squirrel at brunians.org><6b7f371340ef22d8573c08b41c4ce61f.squirrel at webmail.prismnet.com><1f7617370912181743u425265fav4a656a3a292304e2 at mail.gmail.com><F988D5D679604BD395A6C18B77BE1218@eMachinePC><1f7617370912191001i6adf6c4apdc4bc39c9a0a6a3e at mail.gmail.com><DF85DD48D6E24995AD32A002C51FD0CD@eMachinePC><93d4039f0912200542g41c905dcv2a23c5f89a81b70 at mail.gmail.com><D44EE070AB7C406198A4BAD515ADD3D5@eMachinePC>
	<1f7617370912201816w3b0a7c57j9a9d476afb3d404f at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <71657D0EAB474CE393727CE127BF5DE8@eMachinePC>

Dan'l says:
>Obviously, I disagree. If others broke their oaths, that does not excuse
>him breaking his. If the Pope and all the Bishops jumped off the Wurtemberg
>tower, would that mean Luther should? As it were. Luther was setting 
>himself
>up as _better_than_ the Church hierarchy. To
>begin that project by breaking his oaths casts the whole project in doubt.

This is so far off. Where to begin?

1) Getting married was not the START of his project. The start was that 95 
Theses nailed to the door of the church. In response Luther was condemned as 
a heretic, his prospects not so different from Salmon Rushdie's after the 
fatwa and his life-style far less glamorous and much more austere. The 
condemnation occurred FOUR YEARS before he married. He had been 
excommunicated 5 years, and it was 8 years after his dramatic attempt to 
change to the direction in the Church.

2) Imagine some oneconvinced you that God had delivered a message to them 
that we all had swear an oath to live in uninsulated shacks in Alaska every 
winter. Then you learned that
a) that person was probably the last person on the planet likely to be 
receiving special messages from God about the way all Christians should 
live, and
b) that person was himself was maintaining a shack in front of a cozy 
mansion which was where he actually lived soaking in a sauna and drinking 
hot cocoa every cold winter night.
c) Finally, you knew that the one source everyone agreed was "God's Word" 
said nothing about living in shacks in Alaska at all, and this guy didn't 
bother to follow any of that either.

Would you still believe your oath had been to God and not to a con man?

To accuse him oath-breaking under his particular circumstances (as he saw 
them), is like saying the people who ran away from the Jonestown cult during 
the kool-aid party were oath breakers because their oaths had actually been 
made to God.

I repeat: AS LUTHER SAW IT. I'm not saying the RCC is a Jim Jones cult. I'm 
only saying that Luther considered his oath wrongly extracted from him based 
on his personal, visual experience in Rome and Bavaria, his knowledge of 
history, and a flat reading of the Scripture. And, for that reason, wrongly 
directed.

John says:
>This is not my experience (and I've been Catholic my whole
>life and went to Catholic school until I was 22).  I'm not sure
>I've met a Catholic under the age of 30 who would agree with
>this characterization--and maybe not under the age of 50."

I accept that your experience is more valid than my hearsay. But we're not 
talking about the last 50 years. We're talking about the early 1500s in 
Bavaria. The state of mind of the purchasers and the claims of the sellers 
are all that matter. It doesn't even matter if Purgatory is actually not 
every bit as bad as Hell, or even that it is not a "real place". It is 
sufficient that it be genuinely unpleasant and that the Church 
representatives were selling a promised sure-fire way to reduce the time 
there.

J.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net