The Sorcerer's House

John Watkins · 16 Mar 2010, 02:05 · from 2010-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: john.watkins04 at gmail.com (John Watkins)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:05:14 -0400
Subject: (urth) The Sorcerer's House
In-Reply-To: <C7C4347E.B5F8%ishmael at drizzle.com>
References: <43960c851003151459u3c498829jd31ae3bb3983d571 at mail.gmail.com>
	<C7C4347E.B5F8%ishmael at drizzle.com>
Message-ID: <93d4039f1003151905o1c6f6679k94ba3fa843098966 at mail.gmail.com>

Evil Guest, yes.  I liked the pulpy feel and the Cthulhu stuff, and I
actually liked Cassie (which I think is a minority opinion.)

Pirate Freedom, no.  Just a puzzlebox.

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:01 PM, James Crossley <ishmael at drizzle.com>wrote:

>  On 3/15/10 1:59 PM, "Russell Wodell" <wrustle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  As in *Castleview* and parts of *Free Live Free*, there is such a
> plethora of weird incidents, conveyed at really breakneck speed by a
> typically laconic and unemotional Wolfe narrator, that I find the necessary
> suspension of disbelief very difficult.
>
> Wolfe is very much smarter than I am, so he must anticipate something of
> this reaction. The story seems to demand being read straight; yet there are,
> for another example, no less than three sets of identical twins at large,
> plus an evil dwarf bent on rape (who is explicitly identified with a Dickens
> character I will not name here).
>
> Does he want us to laugh? I add that Wolfe's few explicit attempts at
> humour, such as his Sherlock Holmes and Nero Wolfe parodies, have always
> struck me as leaden failures.
>
>
> Russell Wodell
>
> I?m about two-thirds of the way through *Sorcerer?s House* and find myself
> in agreement with much of what you?ve said.  I can?t really imagine how this
> stuff reads to anyone not very familiar with Wolfe?s work.  The characters
> seem inconsistently buffoonish and brilliant, and major events are glossed
> while inconsequential conversations take up paragraphs?to all appearances.
>
>
> As with other late-period Wolfe, the surface reading is off-putting not
> because of baroque vocabulary or complexity, but for opposite reasons.
>  Everything is played so straight and so (apparently) simplistically that
> there?s next to no pleasure to be had for anyone not racking his brains to
> keep up with the subtext.  Now, I love the puzzling subtext and think the
> book is worth reading just for that, but what I always really enjoyed about
> the greatest Wolfean works was the richness available on all levels.
>
> Does anyone on the list really find these late volumes?I?m thinking of *Evil
> Guest* and *Pirate Freedom*, and even *Memorare*?enjoyable as anything
> other than puzzleboxes?
>
> James
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100315/90e4de11/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net