The Sorcerer's House Questions (Major Spoilers)

Mr Thalassocrat · 23 Mar 2010, 21:37 · from 2010-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: thalassocrat08 at gmail.com (Mr Thalassocrat)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:07:53 +1030
Subject: (urth) The Sorcerer's House Questions (*Major Spoilers*)
In-Reply-To: <cbf55b101003231421p46eb0171xfcdcc5862af81e5c at mail.gmail.com>
References: <44fb53d11003191442y48191c3ataaac84d798b8b983 at mail.gmail.com>
	<b12d82081003222138q4670afa3m4f2b34e187c18198 at mail.gmail.com>
	<cbf55b101003230601q4e16f289qbd590f7295bd9db7 at mail.gmail.com>
	<b12d82081003231331o2b7b812ft75ea33e771445c9c at mail.gmail.com>
	<cbf55b101003231421p46eb0171xfcdcc5862af81e5c at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b12d82081003231437p78ef4ad3h51100921272843e at mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Mr Thalassocrat
> <thalassocrat08 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But it's Bax who makes a will in favour of George, and Bax who
> "disappears".
>
> According to the message from George, they both make a will in favor
> of each other. Bax has a good reason to want to replace George and not
> just kill him: there will be zero questions asked this way (notice
> that the final letter's lame explanation of Bax just going off into
> faerie for no stated reason, forever, apparently is completely
> successful - the endnote presents 'George' as having no trouble
> whatsoever managing Bax's estate, George's estate, or having Bax
> declared dead).
>
> > Everything about the replacement is under Bax's control, really, if he
> can
> > get George to come to him, set George up to be killed, dispose of the
> body &
> > get Millie to accept him (Bax) as "George". Faerie isn't an essential
> > element for this scheme.
>
> Neither twin seems to be especially in control. Both need to kill each
> other. Bax *might* be able to forge George's signature, but he still
> needs George dead, and vice versa. I don't really follow what you're
> saying here - if there's any advantage accruing to Bax, isn't that
> just further evidence that Bax did kill & replace George?
>
>

Sure - we're agreed that Bax killed & replaced George. The discussion (I
thought) was about whether Bax planned it all along. I think he might have.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100324/a0c96915/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net