Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The Sorcerer's House Questions (*Major Spoilers*)

Thomas Bitterman · 27 Mar 2010, 14:51 · from 2010-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: tom at bitterman.net (Thomas Bitterman)
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:51:08 -0400
Subject: (urth) The Sorcerer's House Questions (*Major Spoilers*)
In-Reply-To: <37bfbeb61003261844l23179778rd267a2ff2a0f5590 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <44fb53d11003191442y48191c3ataaac84d798b8b983 at mail.gmail.com>
	<b12d82081003222138q4670afa3m4f2b34e187c18198 at mail.gmail.com>
	<cbf55b101003230601q4e16f289qbd590f7295bd9db7 at mail.gmail.com>
	<b12d82081003231331o2b7b812ft75ea33e771445c9c at mail.gmail.com>
	<cbf55b101003231421p46eb0171xfcdcc5862af81e5c at mail.gmail.com>
	<b12d82081003231437p78ef4ad3h51100921272843e at mail.gmail.com>
	<cbf55b101003231553r57707c42lfb9d6ed34fe2d324 at mail.gmail.com>
	<e11bddb61003261825q5ba9f501xfd488cb4c59bf821 at mail.gmail.com>
	<37bfbeb61003261844l23179778rd267a2ff2a0f5590 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e11bddb61003270751x57767082wae689f1c0fde59e3 at mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Jonathan Goodwin <joncgoodwin at gmail.com>wrote:

> Identifying the compiler and Bax makes everything too easy. If you can
> reconcile this with an implied author compiler and the psychic, then
> it might work better. (I had somewhat similar thoughts.)
>

The psychic is a confederate.  She is paid for her help in getting Millie to
buy in to the whole Faerie thing.  Having a psychic as a fraud would fit
Wolfe.

A little terminology before handling the Compiler.  Let's use "author" to
indicate the writer of the story, in the world of the story.  For example,
Severian or Watson.  We can then use "Author" to identify the real-life
writer, for example Wolfe or Doyle.

Wolfe has used the author/Author distinction before, in Urth.  In Urth,
Wolfe explicitly identifies when the Author is speaking.  If we take it as a
rule that Wolfe always identifies when the Author is speaking, then the
lack of identification of the Compiler as the Author would make the Compiler
the author.  That is, the Compiler is a fictional character who wrote the
story,
in the world of the story.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100327/b260ef0f/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net