Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The Sorcerer's House Questions (*Major Spoilers*)

James Wynn · 17 Apr 2010, 23:42 · from 2010-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:42:59 -0500
Subject: (urth) The Sorcerer's House Questions (*Major Spoilers*)
In-Reply-To: <483783.96122.qm at web37606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <p2oe11bddb61003301936xa2f0970en2c959bd358e2a128 at mail.gmail.com>
	<4BB2CC14.9020208 at gmail.com>
	<483783.96122.qm at web37606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <j2ze8e9702e1004171642m8de556a0lb8965f5ecbd02f83 at mail.gmail.com>

>So maybe the question with Bax is whether or not his ability to tell a wonderful,
>compelling, puzzling story (which is, of course, also Wolfe's talent) is innocent or
>dangerous? From that angle, it seems like one of the "big issues" with TSH is the
>relationship between fantasy and dishonesty. That seems like a perfectly appropriate
>theme for a writer who has always maintained that fantasy is one of the best ways to
>deal with the "really real" -- why shouldn't he write a story that explicitly explores the
>other side of that coin?

I just think the story is lame if the whole thing is a fabrication of
Bax's, because --after all-- it already IS a fabrication by Wolfe. It
would be like saying everything in the Latro novels was a product of
Latro's deranged state due to his wound. It makes trying to understand
the "contrived" story to be moot, because any inconsistencies can be
marked up to shoddy story-telling. We're already facing the problems
of possible plot-holes anyway. If we treat the story as a work by Bax
instead of Wolfe, what is the value of that? Shall we investigate the
quality of Bax's novel instead? I certainly hope this is not true. I'm
not re-reading it as though this is the case, because I don't think
I'm up to analyzing two novels at once.

J.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net