Urth Net

← back to the conversation

TSH: Ted's identity

Roy C. Lackey · 21 Apr 2010, 06:25 · from 2010-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: rclackey at stic.net (Roy C. Lackey)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:25:10 -0500
Subject: (urth) TSH: Ted's identity
References: <p2oe11bddb61003301936xa2f0970en2c959bd358e2a128 at mail.gmail.com><4BB2CC14.9020208 at gmail.com><483783.96122.qm at web37606.mail.mud.yahoo.com><j2ze8e9702e1004171642m8de556a0lb8965f5ecbd02f83 at mail.gmail.com><1870.72.171.0.142.1271549033.squirrel at brunians.org><k2he8e9702e1004200827j42c5ef7bp4ff1a9bc5333b3ad at mail.gmail.com><656285.19570.qm at web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com><002b01cae0b7$af48c7e0$b5cd4a0c@rclackey>
	<912986.45611.qm at web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <001b01cae11b$681120c0$b8d24a0c@rclackey>

Taking up where I left off:

Craig Brewer wrote:
> And do we think he's actually dead and what Bax/Doris see is his ghost? Or
has he just relocated to faerie like Black seems to have done? The list of
characters specifically identifies Ambrosius as a "murdered" sorcerer, so if
Ted and Ambrosius are the same, we're seeing his ghost?<

I'm not sure what to think about Ted. Doris claimed to still be paying off
his medical bills, which suggests he died, probably in a hospital. Funerals
can be faked, like Skotos's.

The best Bax could figure, Skotos showed up about the time Black
disappeared. Bax stopped drinking three years and ten months ago, presumably
when he went to prison. He spent a little over three years there and had
been out for less than six months. Skotos "died" three years ago, just about
the time Bax went to prison.

Martha left her younger twins when they were still young boys. (I'm not sure
how that works. If no one ages in Faerie, how could they ever grow up There?
Bax pegged their age at 13 to 15. How did they get to be that old unless
they spent those years Here?)

I'm rambling here. <g>

> But even more than that...why is Ambrosius or Ted even in the story, for
that matter? I can't quite figure out their significance, other than as an
added bit of strangeness.<

The ring with the changeable stone that Bax found in the catfish was
apparently the object in which Ambrosius had stored some of his power (270).
So Ted's ring probably had nothing to do with Ambrosius. Ambrosius was
Black's rival in some sense (ibid.). I suggest that the external object in
which Black stored some of his power was the poor wooden crutch old Nick
carried but didn't need to walk. At the final river battle, old Nick
revealed himself as Zwart Black and his crutch became more like a hiker's
staff and had a "gold head" (284).

I showed earlier that Ted is not Black. Black is not dead and has his own
"weapon of sorcery" (so called, p-73). If Goldwurm killed Ambrosius, he
obviously did not kill Black. *After* Doris gave Bax Ted's ring, when the
big man we later learn looked like Ted showed up when Ieuan was beating Bax,
Bax saw a ring on the big man's hand (50). (At least I *think* he meant a
ring on the man's hand. Maybe not.) That ring, at the time, made Bax think
the big man was "something else" than the boy's father, a false conclusion
he came to after the event. What the hell? What ring could dead Ted have
been wearing that night? According to Doris, he hadn't even been buried with
his wedding band, which was then being worn by Bax.

What "something else" could Bax have thought him to be? A ghost, because the
ring on the man's hand (if that is intended) looked like one of the two he
himself was wearing? Remember, at that point Bax didn't know what Ted or
Black looked like. Or Ambrosius.

Whatever the conclusion Bax came to about this ring at the time, why did he
later decide the big man must be the boy's father?

-Roy


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net