TSH: Ted's identity
James Wynn · 21 Apr 2010, 19:02
· from 2010-April.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:02:43 -0500 Subject: (urth) TSH: Ted's identity In-Reply-To: <005101cae0e6$72bd7800$76d14a0c@rclackey> References: <p2oe11bddb61003301936xa2f0970en2c959bd358e2a128 at mail.gmail.com> <4BB2CC14.9020208 at gmail.com> <483783.96122.qm at web37606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <j2ze8e9702e1004171642m8de556a0lb8965f5ecbd02f83 at mail.gmail.com> <1870.72.171.0.142.1271549033.squirrel at brunians.org> <k2he8e9702e1004200827j42c5ef7bp4ff1a9bc5333b3ad at mail.gmail.com> <656285.19570.qm at web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <002b01cae0b7$af48c7e0$b5cd4a0c@rclackey> <912986.45611.qm at web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <005101cae0e6$72bd7800$76d14a0c@rclackey> Message-ID: <l2ge8e9702e1004211202h3d877ac8tcbd91eb5d27e5760 at mail.gmail.com> > Well, hell! My wife hasn't read the book, knows nothing about it. But I just > described the scene to her that Doris described in her letter, and said that > a monogrammed handkerchief, the obvious choice, probably wasn't the answer. > She came up with stationery. Duh! In a book made up of letters! Who wudda > thunk it! Well, at least stationary has a corner. A shirt doesn't work. But an envelope has a corner and one might put their initials in the return address.It would have to be a letter *he* had written. But any explanation needs a good reason why she wouldn't say what it was. I would think it would be something too disgusting to write or something very incriminating to Ted or Doris. It's needs to be a key to the plot or else why make such a big deal of it? There are really not that many things that are commonly monogrammed, I think, and I'm really befuddled. J.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net