Urth Net

← back to the conversation

TSH: Ted's identity

John Watkins · 21 Apr 2010, 19:05 · from 2010-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: john.watkins04 at gmail.com (John Watkins)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:05:11 -0400
Subject: (urth) TSH: Ted's identity
In-Reply-To: <l2ge8e9702e1004211202h3d877ac8tcbd91eb5d27e5760 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <p2oe11bddb61003301936xa2f0970en2c959bd358e2a128 at mail.gmail.com>
	<483783.96122.qm at web37606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<j2ze8e9702e1004171642m8de556a0lb8965f5ecbd02f83 at mail.gmail.com>
	<1870.72.171.0.142.1271549033.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<k2he8e9702e1004200827j42c5ef7bp4ff1a9bc5333b3ad at mail.gmail.com>
	<656285.19570.qm at web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<002b01cae0b7$af48c7e0$b5cd4a0c@rclackey>
	<912986.45611.qm at web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<005101cae0e6$72bd7800$76d14a0c@rclackey>
	<l2ge8e9702e1004211202h3d877ac8tcbd91eb5d27e5760 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <s2x93d4039f1004211205xcd02ebb1qcbb32b8b453c2a31 at mail.gmail.com>

People (especially married people) also monogram towels.  And towels are
frequently wet.  Especially if they've just been used to dry someone off,
after maybe crawling in from the river or after showering off after crawling
out of a grave.

Just thought I'd throw my wild speculation out there.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:02 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:

> > Well, hell! My wife hasn't read the book, knows nothing about it. But I
> just
> > described the scene to her that Doris described in her letter, and said
> that
> > a monogrammed handkerchief, the obvious choice, probably wasn't the
> answer.
> > She came up with stationery. Duh! In a book made up of letters! Who wudda
> > thunk it!
>
> Well, at least stationary has a corner. A shirt doesn't work. But an
> envelope has a corner and one might put their initials in the return
> address.It would have to be a letter *he* had written. But any
> explanation needs a good reason why she wouldn't say what it was. I
> would think it would be something too disgusting to write or something
> very incriminating to Ted or Doris. It's needs to be a key to the plot
> or else why make such a big deal of it? There are really not that many
> things that are commonly monogrammed, I think, and I'm really
> befuddled.
>
> J.
>  _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100421/8b451a09/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net