Jaynes and Wolfe

CRCulver · 30 Oct 1998, 01:49 · from urth-v0021.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: CRCulver at aol.com
Subject: Re:  (urth) Jaynes and Wolfe
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 20:49:47 EST
Message-ID: <urth-v0021-0012 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0021/0012.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alga wrote:
<Interesting, for instance, Silk's blind faith in his Outsider>

But Wolfe has said that the Outsider is "a spiritual god," which to me means
the Outsider is the Pancreator.

<the relationship between "gods" and men in BOTLS too--almost directly for =
the
former. BOTLS (which I admire more structurally with each
contemplation--especially since I don't think Wolfe was strong with structu=
re
up to that point) could be read as Wolfe's attempt to integrate Jaynes with
his (Wolfe's) new knowledge of computers.>

I should mention that there is another book inspired by Jaynes' book, though
very different from Gene Wolfe. It is Neal Stephenson's _Snow Crash_, which=
 is
a hilarious sort of cross between a cyberpunk novel and a satire of that
genre. It would be interesting reading for Wolfe fans with time on their
hands, 'cause you can compare what Stephenson did to Wolfe's interpretation.

<BTW, I don't posit that Wolfe actually *bought* the Jaynes thesis, which h=
as
been pretty thoroughly scientifically pooh-poohed>

My acquaintances in the mental sciences (psychology, psycholinguistics,
psychaitry) have informed me that the book is 90% crap, but that's in
accordance with Sturgeon's Law. When I read the book, I enjoyed its
entertaining qualities, and didn't believe a word of it. Still, Jaynes was
Professor of Psychology at Princeton, so he's no crackpot.

<Contrast with Hamlet's caution re the authenticity of the Ghost>

Y'know, I was reading _Hamlet_ the other day, and I found a strong influence
on Wolfe in it, and now I've totally forgotten it. Hopefully it'll come aga=
in.
I think I've yet to post the (rather obvious, to me) link to _Macbeth_ in
SotT.

Christopher R. Culver <crculver at aol.com>
http://members.aol.com/crculver/index.html
------------------------------------------------

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net