started my second read of New Sun

Gwern Branwen · 17 May 2010, 21:20 · from 2010-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gwern0 at gmail.com (Gwern Branwen)
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:20:08 -0400
Subject: (urth) started my second read of New Sun
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikyCYMmZMW8sPXESpu9wXcxAYDHYmS70Dt86wdF at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W1098623540113A2E5B0B11CFE00 at phx.gbl>
	<AANLkTinV1jlwY6JMB7b_YTLJdpguOkEcRNFfGD9T2zll at mail.gmail.com>
	<c81d23d8628d017c8e929c2dbb70ae1c.squirrel at webmail.prismnet.com>
	<AANLkTindfLE5j--RrlmIZJKiS7mkazAalLsFKiczCQLO at mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikyCYMmZMW8sPXESpu9wXcxAYDHYmS70Dt86wdF at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimRzhqp5_0FrxqVNWlsnnjdCXApEtyt1QPkwymL at mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Lane Haygood <lhaygood at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> While de Chardin has not been officially denounced as a heretic, severe
>> "warnings" are attached to his work by the Roman Catholic Church.
>>
>
> Which has not, of course, kept Roman Catholic authors from utilizing
> his philosophy and theology as the basis for their stories.
>
> I think Wolfe, unlike Simmons, might stop short of saying that man
> will surpass God as the Hieros surpassed Man. ?The idea of man
> creating his superior is not foreign to sf; robotics (and more
> recently) genetic manipulation have produced many such stories. ?The
> trope of the created surpassing the creator, the student defeating the
> master, etc., is a very common one.
>
> But Wolfe (who loves to f$%! with tropes) might be stopping this one
> up a bit short. ?Maybe the evolution isn't so much circular as it is
> spiral-shaped... ever increasing but always falling short of the true
> majesty of the Increate because no matter how great the successive
> lower-universe iterations get, all the way from protozoa to
> Hierogrammates to angels or whatever, they are all still bounded by
> temporality and being subject to this notion of change from one thing
> to the other, of growth.

Spiral-shaped? Come on, this isn't R.A. Laffferty or _Tengen Toppen
Gurren Lagann_. :)

-- 
gwern

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net