Wolfe as Heretic
Matthew Weber · 19 May 2010, 23:18
· from 2010-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: palaeologos at gmail.com (Matthew Weber) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 16:18:26 -0700 Subject: (urth) Wolfe as Heretic In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinbwLkcys1wGDbWpVAQrReZBbfxetfcdcMb_YaC at mail.gmail.com> References: <SNT123-W43FBDA10A167D2011AE70CFE20 at phx.gbl> <4BF3F69D.5060501 at gmail.com> <AANLkTil6l0l0u4Tolr-BIjc-P7obU49S2pmW9vvTLzeN at mail.gmail.com> <4BF46926.5020500 at gmail.com> <AANLkTinbwLkcys1wGDbWpVAQrReZBbfxetfcdcMb_YaC at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <AANLkTin5VlISjKLTJdSEsnQVa5JiolrUURQkcbr0hl-Y at mail.gmail.com> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Lane Haygood <lhaygood at gmail.com> wrote: > Remember also that the several writers of Biblical texts came from > different stages along the evolution of the native Hebrew religion > from one essentially indistinguishable from the general polytheism of > the region to one of henotheism (in essence, a cult of Yahweh) to one > of monotheism. The work of the scholars and priests of Judaism has > been to change the religion. This could be a side effect of > standardization of practice and teachings, in essence, organizing the > religion from its tribal roots to one practiced by a priestly caste > and promulgated through the use of standard texts and "orthodox" > theology. > > The Bible (as well as early Church teachings based on it) represents > the cultural, social and theological evolution of a people. > > LH > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > That's one theory, certainly, but it's not uncontroversial even among comparative religionists. Judaism was constantly cheek-by-jowl with paganism, and there was a constant struggle to keep it free of the religious observances of "the nations". There is an observable change from the Pentateuch's language concerning other gods (what Max Mueller termed "henotheistic") to that of the later Writings and Prophets, but that may not be as significant as Mueller thought it was. And Mueller himself was far from an objective observer, since his teleology leads ultimately to a non-personal, transcendent God which is inseparable from Nature--familiar to those who have read widely in late 19th-century liberal Christianity. I will grumpily admit, however, that "henotheism" is a useful word. Just a brief comment on Antonio's point earlier : The position of the Vatican, as far as I'm aware, is that Satan indeed has objective existence, and power to tempt humanity. Magic has always been forbidden (despite Renaissance speculations and hair-splitting), not because it doesn't work, but because one petitions the wrong forces in using it. In James Blish's excellent novel *The Day After Judgment*, the black magician Theron Ware upbraids a Dominican who practices ritual magic and divination by saying something like "There is no such thing as 'white magic'. It is all black, black, black as the ace of spades." That's the official RC position as near as I can figure, and although to believe in the efficacy of sorcery might be old-fashioned, it ain't heretical. -- Matt + I feel again a spark of that ancient flame. Virgil [Publius Vergilius Maro] (70-19 B.C.), Aeneid, bk. IV, l. 23 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100519/7cec3d91/attachment.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net