Proper Use of Subject Lines
David Stockhoff · 21 May 2010, 12:19
· from 2010-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 08:19:53 -0400 Subject: (urth) Proper Use of Subject Lines In-Reply-To: <mailman.7580.1274414864.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net> References: <mailman.7580.1274414864.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net> Message-ID: <4BF67A69.6010706 at verizon.net> Yes. Is it too much to ask that the subject line be used as intended to promote efficiency of communication and discussion? It has nothing to do with the value of a particular message or discussion. ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 23:59:16 -0400 From: John Watkins <john.watkins04 at gmail.com> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net> Subject: Re: (urth) Gene Wolfe Message-ID: <AANLkTilkTddQlipvBGMfMJrRjPDbECtV2-DHU0z6gdb- at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I have to agree. On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Craig Brewer <cnbrewer at yahoo.com> wrote: > Talk about whatever you want. I don't even care if it ends up in my > mailbox. I just want to know if I can delete it without having to read it > first. I like to think that emails from a Gene Wolfe mailing list with > "Wolfe" in the subject line might actually be about Wolfe rather than > someone's own personal theology and other peoples' arguments about it. > >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net