OT: Improper Use of Subject Lines

James Wynn · 24 May 2010, 15:15 · from 2010-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:15:46 -0500
Subject: (urth) OT: Improper Use of Subject Lines
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimasI-I56-mJqq1uO808jz_LqvGBkbuMuLwRCHA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.7580.1274414864.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>	<4BF67A69.6010706 at verizon.net>
	<4BF69242.9090304 at io.com>	<4BF69FD2.5060703 at gmail.com>
	<4BFA3F31.60805 at io.com>	<39de58ac87ed288fae36a612c71be800.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<AANLkTimasI-I56-mJqq1uO808jz_LqvGBkbuMuLwRCHA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4BFA9822.9060700 at gmail.com>

But then we have to endure threads on the rules of good subject lines. I 
think it is better to keep the list in line by modeling good behavior 
rather having self-appointed cops. Ever live in a neighborhood with 
extensive homeowner codes and have to live next to the lady who 
memorized them? Ever had someone yell at you because your Yorkshire 
Terrier, walking at your feet, is not on a leash? ("It's the LAW!")

On 5/24/2010 10:04 AM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> Discipline, voluntarily enforced, is a Good Thing.
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net