Exproper Use of Subject Lines

brunians at brunians.org · 24 May 2010, 16:13 · from 2010-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 12:13:45 -0400
Subject: (urth) Exproper Use of Subject Lines
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimytdbwsHYcEAjFkmS2P27tf75le4SNaB6bWlw- at mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.7580.1274414864.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
	<4BF67A69.6010706 at verizon.net> <4BF69242.9090304 at io.com>
	<4BF69FD2.5060703 at gmail.com> <4BFA3F31.60805 at io.com>
	<39de58ac87ed288fae36a612c71be800.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<AANLkTimasI-I56-mJqq1uO808jz_LqvGBkbuMuLwRCHA at mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimytdbwsHYcEAjFkmS2P27tf75le4SNaB6bWlw- at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9f134441959e844b99f999680bcba7b4.squirrel at brunians.org>

Explain to me how you can use the words 'voluntary' and 'enforced'
together and make sense.

.



> Agreed.
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Discipline, voluntarily enforced, is a Good Thing.
>>
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:22 AM, ?<brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>>> Ve must haff DISCIPLINE!
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 5/21/2010 9:59 AM, James Wynn wrote:
>>>>> On 5/21/2010 9:01 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> n my experience, it is unless you have a moderator with the ability
>>>>>> and the will to enforce pertinent subject
>>>>> I have, in the past, attempted to change the subject lines of threads
>>>>> as
>>>>> they moved OT. Maybe half or less of the participants followed. If
>>>>> the
>>>>> particular email that prompted them to responded did not have a
>>>>> changed
>>>>> subject, they didn't change it. Probably, because they didn't care
>>>>> about
>>>>> it as much as me or Mr. Brewer. Or, in the respondents opinion, their
>>>>> response *did* have to do with the original subject line. Hopeless
>>>>> cause.
>>>>
>>>> it's not a hopeless cause, it just requires enforcement. I do it on
>>>> playtest discussion lists all the time: I lay out the rules for
>>>> subject
>>>> lines, ask people nicely to follow them, warn them when they go
>>>> astray,
>>>> and if they persist in going astray, I send them to the land of
>>>> postings-held-until-released-by-a-moderator to wander in the
>>>> wilderness
>>>> until they see the light.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
>>>> IEEE Student Chapter Blog at
>>>> < http://ieeetamut.org >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Urth Mailing List
>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Urth Mailing List
>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net