OT: Improper Use of Subject Lines

Jeff Wilson · 24 May 2010, 16:39 · from 2010-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:39:48 -0500
Subject: (urth) OT: Improper Use of Subject Lines
In-Reply-To: <4BFA9822.9060700 at gmail.com>
References: <mailman.7580.1274414864.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>	<4BF67A69.6010706 at verizon.net>	<4BF69242.9090304 at io.com>	<4BF69FD2.5060703 at gmail.com>	<4BFA3F31.60805 at io.com>	<39de58ac87ed288fae36a612c71be800.squirrel at brunians.org>	<AANLkTimasI-I56-mJqq1uO808jz_LqvGBkbuMuLwRCHA at mail.gmail.com>
	<4BFA9822.9060700 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4BFAABD4.80207 at io.com>

On 5/24/2010 10:15 AM, James Wynn wrote:
> But then we have to endure threads on the rules of good subject lines. I
> think it is better to keep the list in line by modeling good behavior
> rather having self-appointed cops.

Ranjit-appointed cops would be ideal, avoiding numerous of the 
pathologies you mention.

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
IEEE Student Chapter Blog at
< http://ieeetamut.org >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net