Religious writers and audiences

Pedro Pereira · 05 Jun 2010, 18:48 · from 2010-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: domus_artemis at hotmail.com (Pedro Pereira)
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:48:36 +0300
Subject: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
In-Reply-To: <454980.67983.qm at web37602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <SNT123-W17F478B464F0A2A2D619BECFD10 at phx.gbl>,
	<AANLkTin3rMIbdFlB_Ts9oQg54a5xHmUMyoxL-4Rly5wb at mail.gmail.com>,
	<COL105-W6B0E3F09D93E0A7430DAF85D10 at phx.gbl>,
	<07e417fccdd43f81f01ae6443657010a.squirrel at brunians.org>,
	<COL105-W6542F88CE562742D51698485D10 at phx.gbl>,
	<4C080BAA.9010607 at io.com>,
	<810694.75476.qm at web50702.mail.re2.yahoo.com>,
	<F7BD5858-DAB4-43C1-B10A-80DDDBC14E03 at io.com>,
	<380869.45950.qm at web50705.mail.re2.yahoo.com>,
	<AANLkTimS1tZxSsrbSuR2k4lhufvHSSADWlTvG1FXLjW8 at mail.gmail.com>,
	<230974.97402.qm at web50708.mail.re2.yahoo.com>,
	<AANLkTimfrrgWQyeAkO2qLIHZO8sDvU7p7DdamvgtIYxq at mail.gmail.com>,
	<4C098D23.4010800 at io.com>,
	<AANLkTilfqgNsRsyEvNoURxC0DuC2SsqGfpKQTRU-EMEX at mail.gmail.com>,
	<AANLkTim6qoypcXaggp4NErK5X9SHekj2TnpH4LJ_5qdE at mail.gmail.com>,
	<454980.67983.qm at web37602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <COL105-W65E52585885FFF9A6B559385D30 at phx.gbl>

I'm an atheist. Sometimes I do feel here and there a certain morality aspect rising from the books at certain points, but I can't say I ever felt preached to by Wolfe. Plus, I view the character as someone different from me and not necessarily sharing my world views so I can live with that.

Curiously I have more problems with Wolfe's interviews than his books. He is viewing the world from the point of view of a religious person (nothing wrong with that and oviously expected) but sometimes his opinions, specially moral ones, feel to "colored" for my tastes, if you know what I mean. Sometimes I even feel somewhat offended, like when he attributes the "good morals" of the world to the rise of christianity (respect for others, charity, etc) and kind of goes against Islam, giving as example an experience from a friend of his who was at some point in some islamic country, etc. Maybe some of you remember this interview. I felt that it was such a naive and simplistic view of things, and beying an admirer of an obviously very smart person I felt disappointed.

His work, however, never made me feel as an "outsider" (lol), I was always abble to connect with the characters, the story, etc, without feeling that I was reading a book whose main objective was to preach to me through some dissimulated means. I'm also abble to feel the sense of wonder at "revelation", like Silk when he finds the Outsider and so on, even though I'm not religious myself. 

I fell in love with Wolfe's prose when I was in my early teens (12 maybe), I had no idea who he was and I had this book called "shadow of the torturer" that I borrowed from an uncle of mine. Even though it was a translation it felt special, unique, and quite different from what I had read before. And then there was the beautifully imagined world, which has no paralel. Even after I discovered that Wolfe's religious beliefs/views played a big part in his work, I never really felt betrayed or dissapointed. I guess it actually made the whole thing more interesting, more "real".

Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 11:22:16 -0700
From: cnbrewer at yahoo.com
To: urth at lists.urth.net
Subject: (urth) Religious writers and audiences

So recent discussions have me thinking about a book that's a couple of years old new, but on topic: _The Magician's Book: A Skeptic's Adventures in Narnia_ by Laura Miller. Basically: young girl loves Narnia, clueless about the religious aspect. Grows up, eyes open, feels betrayed by the allegory. Gets even older, comes to terms with loving a book that she does not at all "believe."

But it brings to mind two questions about Wolfe:
1) In what sense do people feel that his books are "allegorical" (even in the loosest sense) of his (or any) religious views? I take it here that allegorical means more than being informed-by-religion and actually instructive-of or apologetic-for a certain theology, as Lewis apparently wanted Narnia to be?
2) How do his non-Catholic readers react to the overt theologizing and moralizing that is obviously there at times? (This would go for even Catholic readers who might find something non-orthodox.)

I know my views aren't shared by everyone on the list, but I'm skeptical of the idea that Wolfe is always or even primarily interested in writing his own beliefs into his books in any overall consistent way. He seems more to be experimenting with ideas rather than working out a consistent theology, as it were.

But even when he's doing something obvious, like the Severian-as-proto-Christian angle, I find myself fascinated although I'm not particularly Christian (or particularly anything). I've had other friends, particularly the a-religious type, who can't get past the feeling that he's preaching to them to the "what-if" attitude in which I read him.

But I was curious about any variety of views we have on the list.

From: John Watkins <john.watkins04 at gmail.com>
To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
Sent: Sat, June 5, 2010 12:17:31 PM
Subject: Re: (urth) traveling north

And Tolkien would weep a silent tear to see his work called "allegorical."

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com> wrote:

> It's my understanding that was how it started with he drawing distant time
> and CS Lewis drawing distant space, but as it took on a life of its own it
> became increasingly allegorical and less literally our world. Though with
> events like the Bending of the Roads, pretty much any discrepancies can be
> explained away.

No; Middle-earth (or, more properly, Arda) goes back to long before
his famous "bargain" with Lewis. He began writing what would become
_The Silmarillion_ during WWI.

The product of the "bargain" was never completed.

--
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net/

_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100605/1b426b91/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net