Religious writers and audiences

David Stockhoff · 06 Jun 2010, 17:39 · from 2010-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 13:39:53 -0400
Subject: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
In-Reply-To: <mailman.27298.1275845964.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
References: <mailman.27298.1275845964.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
Message-ID: <4C0BDD69.807 at verizon.net>

Well put.

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:29:35 -0400
From: brunians at brunians.org
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
Message-ID: <783f2b629e952fe53af7d165d802b54e.squirrel at brunians.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

No one sees the World.

Everyone sees an image of the World which they build internally, willingly
or no.

The sane person's version of the World more or less (note well) conforms
with the World.

.



> > I'll take a stab and guess that the sane person sees the world as it is.
> >
> > Of course, the sane person actually sees the world as it best serves (or
> > suits) him or her, but that's another question.
> >
> > ------------------------------

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net