Religious writers and audiences

brunians at brunians.org · 06 Jun 2010, 17:53 · from 2010-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:53:31 -0400
Subject: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
In-Reply-To: <COL105-W315A0569C6E93F0E06A55F85D40 at phx.gbl>
References: <mailman.27273.1275842361.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>,
	<4C0BDA7E.1040905 at verizon.net>
	<COL105-W315A0569C6E93F0E06A55F85D40 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <85f3b81d172775306d0a3745f1ad1fb2.squirrel at brunians.org>

Me or him?

.


>
> I agree with everything you say, even though I don't share your
> world/religious views. Thanks for sharing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:27:26 -0400
>> From: dstockhoff at verizon.net
>> To: urth at lists.urth.net
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>>
>> And in a sense I agree with Brunians, because I too see the natural
>> universe as screaming evidence of something---in my case the absolute
>> unnecessariness of a anthropomorphized deity---and see no point in
>> forming an argument connecting them. It just is.
>>
>> However, I don't see people who disagree with that as insane.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:02:58 +0300
>> From: Pedro Pereira <domus_artemis at hotmail.com>
>> To: <urth at lists.urth.net>
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
>> Message-ID: <COL105-W33547DB7D831FD0BAFD37585D40 at phx.gbl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>
>> Fair enough. Guess I missed the memo on Brunians' views and I
>> misinterpreted him. However it is in my opinion pointless to argue such
>> views (or at least I have no interest in arguing those and for that I
>> appologise to Brunians) when one takes "the natural world (as he defines
>> it) and the entire universe to be an argument for his beliefs and in
>> short, his observations are beliefs and his beliefs are observations".
>>
>>
>>
>> Over and out.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969_______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net