Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Religious writers and audiences

Gerry Quinn · 07 Jun 2010, 12:52 · from 2010-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:52:53 +0100
Subject: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
References: <mailman.27396.1275855765.5093.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net><4C0C03B6.60601 at verizon.net>
	<9ad66087a3d8374e7b83bdb6f7869d53.squirrel at brunians.org>
Message-ID: <19DCBA6D415D49BC8A4DE469A1C445DD@jill>


From: <brunians at brunians.org>

> An agnostic reserves his opinion.
>
> He does not know.
>
> This is a rational position.
>
> Knowledge is based upon experience.
>
> If a person has not had experience to convince him of the existence of
> God, it is not rational for him to believe in God.
>
> This is true.
>
> Neither is it rational for him to not believe.

I have never been to Australia, or to Brobdingnag.  Nevertheless I have 
opinions about whether they exist.  Strangely enough, these opinions are 
different.  Do you think I am being inconsistent?

- Gerry Quinn




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net