Travelling North aka miscellaneous thoughts on Wolfe

Jeff Wilson · 10 Jun 2010, 07:38 · from 2010-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:38:51 -0500
Subject: (urth) Travelling North aka miscellaneous thoughts on Wolfe
In-Reply-To: <19DE1994772240508E392EC950186D6C@jill>
References: <SNT123-W47BC00C2E9783E7A5CF620CFD20 at phx.gbl><C2CE3719C3A64EE1BFB6B809D270BD3C@jill>	<4C0BF0C6.7050401 at io.com><BE80B5387D094B30943EE7105A94DB0D@jill><4C0D1AD5.2000205 at gmail.com><1C3CB717443B4FB5B23653467BA709EA@jill>	<AANLkTiluLmYCOAJmZVJNTmh5G7m86ODAKhpG0b4CxkjU at mail.gmail.com>
	<19DE1994772240508E392EC950186D6C@jill>
Message-ID: <4C10968B.30007 at io.com>

On 6/9/2010 10:38 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
> I know that even 'hard' SF writers generally get a free pass when it
> comes to FTL travel. But the method described in 'Urth of the New Sun'
> has two problems with it.
>
> First, there is the usual issue of travelling faster than light. Special
> relativity is well established, and while it could be replaced by a new
> 'aether' theory, any such theory would have the same issue with a
> maximum speed. We regularly push stuff to >99% of light speed and we
> know what happens.
>
> Secondly, the 'tacking' method of travelling faster than the wind works
> for sailboats. But the analogy between wind and light radiation doesn't
> hold up because light does not exert pressure in directions orthogonal
> to its direction of travel, as moving air does.

That's not entirely correct; if the light is reflected at an angle, it 
imparts momentum at an angle normal to the reflecting surface. For 
example if light traveling due north strikes a mirror facing SW and is 
reflected to the west, the mirror is pushed NE. This sort of thing 
really happens, and produces a measureable effect on natural and 
artificial satellites _over_a_period_of_years_.

The trick then is not how The Ship is propelled, but rather how The 
Ship's inertia is nullified to allow this 
more-feeble-than-a-thousand-year-old-butterfly push to make it 
accelerate so quickly.

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
IEEE Student Chapter Blog at
< http://ieeetamut.org >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net