Travelling North aka miscellaneous thoughts on Wolfe

brunians at brunians.org · 10 Jun 2010, 14:07 · from 2010-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:07:39 -0400
Subject: (urth) Travelling North aka miscellaneous thoughts on Wolfe
In-Reply-To: <4C10EEB2.9070808 at lpthe.jussieu.fr>
References: <SNT123-W47BC00C2E9783E7A5CF620CFD20 at phx.gbl>
	<C2CE3719C3A64EE1BFB6B809D270BD3C@jill> <4C0BF0C6.7050401 at io.com>
	<BE80B5387D094B30943EE7105A94DB0D@jill> <4C0D1AD5.2000205 at gmail.com>
	<1C3CB717443B4FB5B23653467BA709EA@jill>
	<AANLkTiluLmYCOAJmZVJNTmh5G7m86ODAKhpG0b4CxkjU at mail.gmail.com>
	<19DE1994772240508E392EC950186D6C@jill> <4C10968B.30007 at io.com>
	<A2B1156C2D544E49B6EF1797A6292750@jill>
	<AANLkTil9Jo-vh1GsBMLxpJq8bnAj_QMrfTqyfFpNi1Wj at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C10EEB2.9070808 at lpthe.jussieu.fr>
Message-ID: <e352a034e08a4951040a40e10ccfce4a.squirrel at brunians.org>

Cool.

.

> That is incorrect. Some quantities might become imaginary but that is a
> mathematical artefact.
> The real point is, if you combine faster than light travel and Lorentz
> invariance of the laws of physics (the invariance principle that is the
> basis of Einstein's theory of special relativity), then you can indeed
> have trajectories which connect two arbitrary points of spacetime i.e.
> in a given reference frame it will look like you can move freely forward
> or backwards in time (you're not going ``straight'' into the past --
> you're making little loops, like travelling to a distant star faster
> than light and then coming back the same way).
>
> On 06/10/2010 03:45 PM, Jack Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>     It is also not clear that moving faster than the speed of light
>>     would allow you to go backward in time.   If the mathematics of
>>     the relativity equations correctly describes reality, then a
>>     velocity greater than the speed of light puts you not into
>>     negative time but into imaginary time.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net