Thus Spoke Severian? (Nietzsche links)
Jon Camfield · 03 Dec 1998, 09:35
· from urth-v0022.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Jon Camfield <GriffJon at Mail.UTexas.edu> Subject: (urth) Thus Spoke Severian? (Nietzsche links) Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 09:35:35 Message-ID: <urth-v0022-0013 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0022/0013.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (Yah, I's been quiet. I's been busy. OTOH, I did have a chance to read lots of Nietzsche, and find a few parallels, only one striking one) In _On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Live (1874), Nietzsche argued that man must live as a balance between remembering and forgetting, and one passage in particular struck me: "Cheerfulness, the good conscience, the joyful deed, confidence in the future -- all of them depend, in the case of the individual as of a nation, on the existence of a line dividing the bright and discernable from the unilluminable and dark; on one's being just as able to forget at the right time as to remember at the right time; on the possession of a powerful instinct for sensing when it is necessary to feel historically and when unhistorically. This, precisely, is the proposition the reader is invited to meditate upon: /the unhistorical and the historical are necessary in equal measure for the health of an individual, of a people and of a culture/." (/../ specify italics, Nietzsche's.) Now, not to overanalyze, (but I wish I knew if Wolfe had read Nietzsche!), but "line dividing the bright ... and dark"? Terminus Est, you mean? Or what about Severian being the 'memory' for a culture living in the present moment (living unhistorically) while immersed in it? And in being the opposite extreme, gives a healthy balance? Also, in _Thus Spoke Zarathustra_, Zara announces the future of humanity as having two possible courses, one towards the Last Man (no lie!), of a future bright in technology and comfort, but immersed in decadence and eventual death, and that of the Superhuman/Overman, who is a dramatic change from current man, an evolution from him, but more a revolution in (moral) thought-- Ash, master of the Last House vs. the Green Man? ...nahhhh. ;) Has anyone else read these connections into Nietzsche, or (as is likely) seen ones I missed? ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Camfield "GriffJon" |Webmaster, Plan II Honors Program: GriffJon at mail.utexas.edu | www.dla.utexas.edu/~plan2 Homepage, Gallery, Resume: |Channel Manager, Undernet #Poetry ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~griffjon | www.tripod.com/~ircpoetry ------------------------------------------------------------------ "Behold the good and the just! Whom do they hate the most? The man who breaks their tables of values, the breaker, the lawbreaker; yes he is the creator" --Nietzsche, _Thus Spoke Zarathustra_ *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net