Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Appearances of Inire

brunians at brunians.org · 01 Jul 2010, 13:08 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:08:35 -0400
Subject: (urth) Appearances of Inire
In-Reply-To: <4C2C8FD5.8090603 at verizon.net>
References: <SNT123-W896FBC5C32F4238BC96E9CFCB0 at phx.gbl>
	<002f01cb180d$52a0c320$0cd24a0c@rclackey> <4C2B4F90.4040708 at gmail.com>
	<4C2B53AF.6040606 at gmail.com> <4C2B5CF2.3040202 at io.com>
	<4C2B71B3.5080308 at gmail.com>
	<91f2cc4d1aa001a130756f20182ad487.squirrel at webmail.prismnet.com>
	<AANLkTimqx0B689CjlqiByBD2fnbqDRLZG7vvjFYs0zQE at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C2C009C.4070402 at verizon.net>
	<1bd7b1bfeebd3535b788f654d9b3efd4.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<4C2C0586.7090503 at verizon.net>
	<487d2869bcbbd06452a6633012d86d83.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<4C2C06E3.4030806 at verizon.net>
	<1362277e8ba9279d24e4bc37d6ab862a.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<4C2C8387.5010304 at verizon.net>
	<AANLkTimVPuEiDXtuPejpVrcqVQUxust0ZazZ-9KU8-r6 at mail.gmail.com>
	<340be9ebf3b4dc0edced26c8b3c68291.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<4C2C8B97.3090405 at verizon.net>
	<AANLkTil1l6W2HVRXGn7IPuddhOoe60sXATFjBDVRUYhS at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C2C8FD5.8090603 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <07eb1d984df90956bc9d4f5cd894e709.squirrel at brunians.org>

What the hell do you have in your pockets, anyway?

.


> Well argued. Extra points for use of Tolkien.
>
> Under #3, presumably, such a being might have enormous powers but feel
> just as lost as humans. Under #1, such a being might feel significantly
> more connected.
>
> One can see how a #3 being might more often go astray, even with good
> intentions, while a #1 being might get carried away with how close to
> the deity he sits and become jealous or rebellious, causing far more
> damage.
>
> John Watkins wrote:
>> Well, I didn't want to get into various schools of angelology in
>> Christian and Gnostic thought.  Obvious there must be /some /possible
>> separation between angelic will and divine will, or fallen angels
>> wouldn't have been possible.  It's my understanding that there are
>> various interpretations of what this means even in our world, and in a
>> consciously created myth it could mean anything (Tolkien's Valar, for
>> instance, are not in constant communication with Illuvatar or anything
>> like it and they make various errors of judgment.  I don't think,
>> however, that they ever lie or commit acts of intentional evil, except
>> for of course Melkor and arguably Aule on one occasion).
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:35 AM, David Stockhoff
>> <dstockhoff at verizon.net <mailto:dstockhoff at verizon.net>> wrote:
>>
>>     #1 could be phrased more strongly, deleting "more or less" and
>>     using the words "infallible" and "definitely in direct contact."
>>     That would be more distinct.
>>
>>     As I understand it.
>>
>>     brunians at brunians.org <mailto:brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>>
>>         There is no meaningful difference between one and three.
>>
>>         .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>             Right.
>>
>>             Although now I will say such a thing.  Tzadkiel presents
>>             himself not as
>>             the
>>             Outsider but as His agent.  Arguably the most important
>>             question of the
>>             series is whether Tzadkiel is lying.  I think there are in
>>             fact three
>>             options:
>>
>>             1)  Tzadkiel is, like a Christian archangel, more or less
>>             in direct
>>             contact
>>             with the will of the deity.  Thus he/she is to be
>>             completely trusted and
>>             is
>>             a more or less incontrovertible moral authority.
>>             2)  Tzadkiel is a creepy insectoid alien thing and a liar.
>>              The
>>             pretentions
>>             of religion are a means of controlling the human race.
>>             3)  Tzadkiel is a "higher" being in some meaningful sense
>>             but remains
>>             metaphysically removed from the divine, like the angel in
>>             "The Cock and
>>             the
>>             Angel."  His/her belief in the Increate and desire to do
>>             its will is
>>             sincere, and to that end he/she is just doing the best
>>             he/she can, but
>>             like
>>             the angel in the story Tzadkiel remains fallible and
>>             infinitely removed
>>             from
>>             the mind of the Increate.
>>
>>             I go back and forth between 2) and 3) myself.
>>
>>             On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:01 AM, David Stockhoff
>>             <dstockhoff at verizon.net
>> <mailto:dstockhoff at verizon.net>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>                 No one said anyone was pretending anything. It was a
>>                 general theoretical
>>                 observation.
>>
>>                 brunians at brunians.org <mailto:brunians at brunians.org>
>>                 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>                      Who usurping where?
>>
>>                     Which archon is pretending to be the Outsider?
>>                     Tzadkiel?
>>
>>                     I don't think so.
>>
>>                     .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                         No, the definition of usurping demands it. So
>>                         does the concept of a
>>                         local archon pretending to be the Outsider.
>>                         You can explain it any way
>>                         you want, but that's the concept.
>>
>>                         Think Tolkien.
>>
>>                         brunians at brunians.org
>>                         <mailto:brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                             Maybe for you.
>>
>>                             .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                 The question, then, is whether such
>>                                 delegation occurred---or not.
>>
>>                                 brunians at brunians.org
>>                                 <mailto:brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                     I don't buy it.
>>
>>                                     God delegates all the time.
>>
>>                                     .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                         Precisely.
>>
>>                                         Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                             On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at
>>                                             11:28 AM, Jeff Wilson
>>                                             <jwilson at io.com
>>                                             <mailto:jwilson at io.com>>
>>                                             wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                 Jeff Wilson wrote
>>                                                 (30-06-2010 16:04):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                         On 6/30/2010
>>                                                         9:24 AM, James
>>                                                         Wynn wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                     There's that thing
>>                                                     about only God
>>                                                     being creator.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                 How is that relevant
>>                                                 here? Do you prefer
>>                                                 that people use
>>                                                 "assemble"
>>                                                 instead of "create"?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                             It's relevant because a
>>                                             race that creates a
>>                                             (slave) race is
>>                                             usurping
>>                                             the privilege of the
>>                                             Creator -- is in fact
>>                                             acting in daemonic
>>                                             manner.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                         _______________________________________________
>>                         Urth Mailing List
>>                         To post, write urth at urth.net
>>                         <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>>                         Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>                         <http://www.urth.net/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                     _______________________________________________
>>                     Urth Mailing List
>>                     To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>>                     Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>                     <http://www.urth.net/>
>>
>>
>>                     ---
>>                     avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>>                     Virus Database (VPS): 100630-1, 06/30/2010
>>                     Tested on: 6/30/2010 11:22:28 PM
>>
>>                     avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
>>                     http://www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>
>>                 Urth Mailing List
>>                 To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>>                 Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>                 <http://www.urth.net/>
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Urth Mailing List
>>             To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>>             Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>             <http://www.urth.net/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Urth Mailing List
>>         To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>>         Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>         <http://www.urth.net/>
>>
>>
>>         ---
>>         avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>>         Virus Database (VPS): 100630-1, 06/30/2010
>>         Tested on: 7/1/2010 8:29:39 AM
>>
>>         avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
>>         http://www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Urth Mailing List
>>     To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>>     Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net <http://www.urth.net/>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>> Virus Database (VPS): 100630-1, 06/30/2010
>> Tested on: 7/1/2010 8:40:39 AM
>> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net