Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The Politics Of Gene Wolfe

brunians at brunians.org · 02 Jul 2010, 12:59 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:59:27 -0400
Subject: (urth) The Politics Of Gene Wolfe
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikWpGWjrLj7bZBguxA013ZrafvZ1fFFNDtUL5R4 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <W447681238525221237244914@webmail21>
	<2605.67.142.130.41.1237261735.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<BLU120-W152537BAF5B236D272D62186980 at phx.gbl>
	<1556.67.142.130.39.1237266391.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<B2156387-2C0B-41C8-A692-569C229615F0 at butcherbaker.org>
	<49BF4515.6080806 at io.com>
	<03FEB8E1-A5CB-4C35-B788-FF0B30DD9AD3 at goosemoon.org>
	<49BF7768.6000407 at io.com>
	<11930.72.171.0.143.1237286160.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<7D7361FF-F396-4C21-AB80-4B18585C708C at io.com>
	<93d4039f0903170724w1424e52cn7998812102dbee6b at mail.gmail.com>
	<2B8C663FAC9D4D39A0D4521DABA89887@eMachinePC>
	<6612.67.142.130.27.1237303208.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<AANLkTikWpGWjrLj7bZBguxA013ZrafvZ1fFFNDtUL5R4 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c7edf12f14629cf6809cb30525b64bc1.squirrel at brunians.org>

It is what the framers thought.

If you don't believe me you should read the Federalist and the
anti-Federalist.

Or just, you know, continue to believe what you prefer to believe.

.


> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM,  <brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>>>> I guess I'm a moderate conservative or libertarian on the issue.
>>>> I think the Second Amendment creates an individual right and
>>>> that that individual right clearly isn't meant to cover every
>>>> conceivable form of weapon.
>>
>>> I would argue that the intent was self-evidently for it to cover every
>>> conceivable type of weapon.
>>
>> Indeed, the most powerful weapons available in the eighteenth century
>> were
>> warships, many of which were privately owned, as was much artillery in
>> the
>> sense of crew-served weapons.
>>
>> The intent of the second amendment is to allow the citizenry to more
>> readily defend themselves against the government, when this becomes
>> necessary, as it inevitably does.
>
> I don't think that this is what the founders thought, but I'd bet good
> money this is what Gene thinks.
>
> I've read through most of _Starwater Strains_ now, and my initial
> belief has hardened: Gene's writings are definitely getting more
> political. In his older works like _Peace_ or _Book of the New Sun_
> (pre-90s), I didn't notice anything political, or at least,
> contemporary. But in stuff from the last 2 decades? My suspicion has
> become certainty.
>
> The stories in SS though are absolutely littered with
> libertarian/conservative plots or asides. Some stories do nothing but
> push such ideas. "Viewpoint", for example, has a dystopian government
> which claims to own all money and which suppresses all weaponry, the
> better to oppress its citizenry; the protagonist, who is a heroic
> moral wilderness survivalist fellow, spends most of the story trying
> to get a weapon. His great victory is to murder a government agent.
> "Has Anyone Seen Junie Moon?", when it's not trying to channel
> Lafferty, ends with best wishes for a rebellion that will kill 'the
> big important gangs with suits and guns' (the government). "The Fat
> Magician" ends with a rant about totalitarian governments. Another
> story seems to implies that the government is responsible for taking
> away everything interesting and handing over power to machines and
> rules ("Petting Zoo"), while in "The Dog of the Drops", the government
> seems to engineer the extinction of dogs because dogs don't pay taxes
> and don't love the government but their owners. (I'm speculating a
> little with this one because the dialect is so hard to read.) And so
> on.
>
> I haven't even finished, but it's all far more blatant than _An Evil
> Guest_.
>
> --
> gwern
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net