The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by Rudesind

David Stockhoff · 02 Jul 2010, 16:30 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:30:49 -0400
Subject: (urth) The mystery of the image
	of	an	astronaut	cleaned	by	Rudesind
In-Reply-To: <4C2E10F2.4000005 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W186492E2214C7539E99F09CFCA0 at phx.gbl>	<4C2A8E44.5040704 at verizon.net>	<4C2BFC40.6060404 at verizon.net>	<4C2C04EF.2010203 at io.com>	<4C2C0655.4010507 at verizon.net>	<4C2C2011.9060307 at gmail.com>	<4C2CB072.20808 at io.com>	<2dc2f9da5b8a851b52b3d871d3ac10ee.squirrel at brunians.org>	<AANLkTikC4Thq8kjaAkgzBli5_YF2QRuC2FvqKZk5Fl8d at mail.gmail.com>	<1a4c459d00e6bfae603d8d424a281478.squirrel at brunians.org>	<AANLkTikWDg_uCKgdT-_tCOkhsPUxytED0Oe7IC2RRFeT at mail.gmail.com>	<64a5f0ccd7ad8135cc880d55f01d35d7.squirrel at brunians.org>	<4C2CC5FB.4090304 at gmail.com>	<65fa45fb235122f7a2217875a2e6addb.squirrel at brunians.org>	<A9A0AEF3-B283-4660-98BA-9E3700100817 at liftingfaces.com>	<4C2D4AA7.90707 at verizon.net>	<b911e4d19bf4a5c6e18f6b7978a18f34.squirrel at brunians.org>	<80e082d548cd62953cc58ba97ddefc59.squirrel at brunians.org>	<4C2D5339.7040508 at verizon.net>	<4C2D6FF2.4000805 at io.com>	<4C2DEFD0.7010805 at verizon.net>	<4C2DFD00.3050609 at gmail.com>	<4C2E0B7B.7000605 at io.com>
	<4C2E10F2.4000005 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C2E1439.9050700 at verizon.net>

As I've said, I can accept the composite theory if I must, but I have 
reason to doubt it. However, since it's supposedly a painting, there may 
be a real painting or illustration that combines these elements and 
therefore "is" the painting if Wolfe saw it---even if Rudesind's is a 
totally different physical painting. All that is necessary is that 
somewhere is a scene that fits the description---not that it be a 
photograph.

And I admit that what really motivates me is that I am sure I've seen it 
somewhere!

Are there any photos with the astronaut holding the flag?

James Wynn wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>> It's true that the figure holds the flag. But you have to allow for
>>>> some poetic license as far as visor color and earth distance.
>>>
>>> _Maybe_ visor color since it is not "entirely gold". But there's no
>>> requirement for Urth size is there?
>>
>> I think "entirely gold" is meant to convey the entire visor is gold 
>> colored, rather than merely a gold band across the eyes or some other 
>> arrangement of detail.
>
> I take it to mean that the visor looked like it was made of gold. That 
> works for the picture.The black could readily be scene as part of the 
> reflection on the visor.
>
>>   Speaking of the visor, if you click to show the full resolution of 
>> the second image linked, you can see another astronaut (apparently 
>> Harrison Schmitt) rather than "nothing more".
>
> Eh...I can see what might be an arm since I know what to look for.
>
> But on reflection, it would have been pointless in this case to 
> reference a single photo among the hundreds taken and illustrations 
> created of the lunar landings. Wolfe described a picture that included 
> the important elements for us to identify the scene and context. We 
> can easily imagine the scene based on his description.
>
> On the other hand, what is Severian looking at when he sees "a dancer 
> whose wings seemed leeches"?
>
> u+169b
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net