Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Lives of the Great Beasts

Jerry Friedman · 02 Jul 2010, 20:36 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jerry_friedman at yahoo.com (Jerry Friedman)
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 13:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) Lives of the Great Beasts
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W48D04E7E5C75069C9DD6E3CFCE0 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W48D04E7E5C75069C9DD6E3CFCE0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <956008.7688.qm at web50703.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

So is there a consensus on what the seventeen megatherians are?

1) What I thought when I first noticed that title was that they were big animals, possibly with "ther(e)" in their names: arsinoither, baluchither, megathere, etc.  The book would be their "life histories": how they are born, grow, eat at different stages, interact with each other and with other organisms, reproduce.  It's just a coincidence that their number is the same as the Group of Seventeen.

2) They're seventeen famous evil people from history.  Cf. Borges's /Universal History of Infamy/.  Again the repetition of seventeen is just a coincidence.

3) They're Erebus, Abaia, etc.  The name and the allusion to Revelation (and Aleister Crowley?) would be appropriate.  The matching with the Group of Seventeen would not be a coincidence--we could speculate that each one "operates" one of the Group, or some such.  (I think somebody said that in the past month or two, maybe Lee Berman?)  It's hard to imagine what a book about their lives would contain, though.

4) They're the original Group of Seventeen, who were probably revolutionaries and evil enough (at least in Commonwealth propaganda) to justify being called great beasts.

5) They're a particularly beastly Group of Seventeen from some point in history.

6) They're something else.

If anyone is thinking of consulting /Lexicon Urthus/, Michael Andre-Driussi is totall noncommittal on this one.

Jerry Friedman



      

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net