Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The mystery of the image of an astronautcleaned by Rudesind

Gerry Quinn · 03 Jul 2010, 16:08 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 17:08:00 +0100
Subject: (urth) The mystery of the image of	an
	astronautcleaned	by	Rudesind
References: <SNT123-W186492E2214C7539E99F09CFCA0 at phx.gbl>	<4C2C04EF.2010203 at io.com>	<4C2C0655.4010507 at verizon.net>	<4C2C2011.9060307 at gmail.com>	<4C2CB072.20808 at io.com>	<2dc2f9da5b8a851b52b3d871d3ac10ee.squirrel at brunians.org>	<AANLkTikC4Thq8kjaAkgzBli5_YF2QRuC2FvqKZk5Fl8d at mail.gmail.com>	<1a4c459d00e6bfae603d8d424a281478.squirrel at brunians.org>	<AANLkTikWDg_uCKgdT-_tCOkhsPUxytED0Oe7IC2RRFeT at mail.gmail.com>	<64a5f0ccd7ad8135cc880d55f01d35d7.squirrel at brunians.org>	<4C2CC5FB.4090304 at gmail.com>	<65fa45fb235122f7a2217875a2e6addb.squirrel at brunians.org>	<A9A0AEF3-B283-4660-98BA-9E3700100817 at liftingfaces.com>	<4C2D4AA7.90707 at verizon.net>	<b911e4d19bf4a5c6e18f6b7978a18f34.squirrel at brunians.org>	<80e082d548cd62953cc58ba97ddefc59.squirrel at brunians.org>	<4C2D5339.7040508 at verizon.net>	<4C2D6FF2.4000805 at io.com>	<4C2DEFD0.7010805 at verizon.net>	<4C2DFD00.3050609 at gmail.com>	<4C2E0B7B.7000605 at io.com>	<4C2E12BF.6050608 at verizon.net>	<4C2E1B1B.9060107 at gmail.com><4C2E1EE2.6000006 at io.com>
	<4C2E3452.3070804 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <B60D35A1370A4E9D94ED356598017744@jill>


From: "Ant?nio Pedro Marques" <entonio at gmail.com>

> But it's far above enough that I think it can be described as being rising 
> over his shoulder 
> (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3012885/Var/AS17-134-20387HR-crop.png). The photo 
> is taken sideways anyway. Why mention the shoulder rather than the head? I 
> think saying it was rising over his head would be strange, as it would 
> give no hint of directionality, either 3D or 2D wise. It doesn't say which 
> shoulder, but that's a matter of leaving off irrelevant information 
> (irrelevant for them, who were looking at the picture).

That makes sense... good literary technique, making a more concrete image 
for the reader.

- Gerry Quinn 


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net