The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by Rudesind

John Watkins · 07 Jul 2010, 17:25 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: john.watkins04 at gmail.com (John Watkins)
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 13:25:52 -0400
Subject: (urth) The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by
	Rudesind
In-Reply-To: <576549.3598.qm at web84104.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <4C34ADD5.6010905 at gmail.com>
	<576549.3598.qm at web84104.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimnLqfpGS5_2wIdkzvyqHUYkKeX1OFh8xHu6APn at mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, DAVID STOCKHOFF <dstockhoff at verizon.net>wrote:

>   "
>
> As for the (ultimately, failed) theory I built concerning Agia, I made the
> narrative implications very clear. That was indeed the point of the
> exercise---to take the perceived possibility of a connection between Agia
> and the doll and test it against the principle that it must add meaning. But
> it required making up too much stuff---more than it explained---which is a
> different principle entirely.
>

Actually, it at least gave me the insight that the "things" Agia "does" for
Hethor probably involve lying very, very still...(shudder)



>
> --- On *Wed, 7/7/10, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: (urth) The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by
> Rudesind
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Date: Wednesday, July 7, 2010, 12:39 PM
>
>  Tim O'Donnell wrote (07-07-2010 17:13):
> > From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=entonio at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:entonio at gmail.com <http://mc/compose?to=entonio at gmail.com>>>
> >
>
> And that is precisely my beef with the drive to reduce characters to some
> specific trait that doesn't mean anything by itself.
>
> - Agia must be a robot because blablabla - but at a certain point, what is
> the relevance of her precise nature?
>
> - Rudesind must be FI in disguise because Fechin is a ranga - but what does
> that gain us?
>
> If there is a common theme in the GW works I've read so far - I'm not
> fortunate enough to have done significant rereading already - is how
> characters break free from their native, starting conditions. Trying to pin
> down exactly what those conditions are, and trying to come up with (or
> outright invent) a definite answer, as if it had in itself a deep
> significance, is in my view misguided - and harmful when it blinds the mind
> to the rest. Their precise nature may be explanative of something else, but
> I just can't see that it can be an interesting fact all by itself.
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100707/633c92ba/attachment-0001.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net