Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by Rudesind

António Pedro Marques · 07 Jul 2010, 21:11 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:11:13 +0100
Subject: (urth) The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by
	Rudesind
In-Reply-To: <4C34DA51.8040901 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W256DB5C8585628C8109423CFB30 at phx.gbl>	<520E36C4-BC0B-4DFE-8F64-BC9EB1D9BF4C at liftingfaces.com>	<4C34A1F4.6030501 at gmail.com>	<F7C7A8D7-66C9-4746-9662-C742E53311FE at liftingfaces.com>	<AANLkTilkfznBstbta55hgfGmNqnPuJiBaxTBg1nk4CNf at mail.gmail.com>	<4C34C6AF.9060709 at gmail.com>	<4C34C8AF.70507 at gmail.com>	<152f839bbd02f83fc03a5318462443d7.squirrel at brunians.org>	<4C34D82D.5070500 at gmail.com>
	<4C34DA51.8040901 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C34ED71.2020108 at gmail.com>

James Wynn wrote (07-07-2010 20:49):
>>>>> Does it deciding that Kent is Superman change the story in any
>>>>> way? I mean, Superman still has to rescue Lois, right?
>>>> If Superman were not Clark, where would he have met Lois? Ok, she's
>>>> a journalist and he's a public figure. If Superman were someone
>>>> else other than Clark, wouldn't he have other singificant people in
>>>> his alternate life whom we know zilch about? Among whom probably
>>>> some love interest. Kent being Superman doesn't change the story
>>>> because in the sorty that's precisely who Kent is. Kent not being
>>>> Superman would certainly call for a quite different story.
> I'm just sayin'. Imagine if Wolfe had written Superman. There's no way
> we'd know for certain Kent and Superman were the same guy. If Wolfe had
> written Murder On the Orient Express, there would be no Hercule Poirot.
> It would have consisted of first person stories from 12 seemingly random
>  passengers and the conductor who found the body. The reader would have
> been expected to play the role of Poirot.

Dunno. Wolfe wrote the March B Street stories. And Cherry Jubilee.

But *if* Wolfe had written Superman and the etxt didn't show Superman and
Clark were the same guy, our speculation that they might be *would* lead to
a richer reading. We would postulate they were the same guy because that
would take the story to a whole new level, not because of some esoteric
motivation for weaving the alter ego theme into it.

Whereas no one has yet explained just what the
considering-that-some-characters-in-the-BNS-are-Inire brings to the table.
Lee points to it enlightening Inire's nature and motivations, but I find
that sketchy. Could your camp do some more sketching, perhaps?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net