Silmarillion

brunians at brunians.org · 07 Jul 2010, 22:42 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 18:42:52 -0400
Subject: (urth) Silmarillion
In-Reply-To: <4C34FBB3.7040509 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W256DB5C8585628C8109423CFB30 at phx.gbl>
	<AANLkTilZSLh8GrS5HUoyikUVyLCI08qIXlUKp0OniIqY at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C34B202.5050507 at gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikCNmssYbfvnrYn1ZE4ZpNPN8qabYF3vdVbNGdB at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C34B82C.9020209 at gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimMWNSFdv-RfXP8bKaqwJLxz6G0N4JPD6RerqKR at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C34BB24.7070801 at gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinVsQnilCHmczgtxdxezdWzo_27v7LjCnaVcSMq at mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimqKwNq60OXgUrAhySpEHMFcMN1zCL3a2eUhHhY at mail.gmail.com>
	<c46106d51bc157c007785d9720d1a6ae.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<AANLkTimEWPJxhS8_Fal89x3HdukvHWOvX0uk0Qlop9Yg at mail.gmail.com>
	<590bbb9d218937ac55bde06ae75b695a.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<AANLkTim7wxkw78ZNp8KngTj0sm3pGxPhB3R0MWLgr_OY at mail.gmail.com>
	<43f4aecb27c4f6d36a65188d35d861df.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<4C34E677.5070501 at gmail.com>
	<aa4f3c0e36eb0cc7e6fb1bcb3ad1cc60.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<4C34EB9C.8070803 at gmail.com>
	<69b4c26803f1d700cdeb6b477ab5644c.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<4C34FB2A.8080103 at gmail.com> <4C34FBB3.7040509 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6992b90f3c5fc3465f15af5bd696ff90.squirrel at brunians.org>

Master Wynn.

.


> On 7/7/2010 5:09 PM, James Wynn wrote:
>> On 7/7/2010 5:06 PM, brunians at brunians.org wrote:
>>> That is your point? Is Tolkien's reading the only reading? Do you
>>> consider Tolkien's reading to be authoritative? I thought you were a
>>> Christian. Are you not a Christian
>>
>> What's the subtext here? Why would taking the AUTHOR's reading as
>> AUTHORitive make one a pagan?
>>
>> u+16b9
>
> Oooh. I think I'm being pranked. I feel like an idiot. I'm hip now.
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net