The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by Rudesind
António Pedro Marques · 07 Jul 2010, 23:15
· from 2010-July.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=) Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:15:00 +0100 Subject: (urth) The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by Rudesind In-Reply-To: <4C34F794.8040104 at gmail.com> References: <SNT123-W256DB5C8585628C8109423CFB30 at phx.gbl> <520E36C4-BC0B-4DFE-8F64-BC9EB1D9BF4C at liftingfaces.com> <4C34A1F4.6030501 at gmail.com> <F7C7A8D7-66C9-4746-9662-C742E53311FE at liftingfaces.com> <AANLkTilkfznBstbta55hgfGmNqnPuJiBaxTBg1nk4CNf at mail.gmail.com> <4C34C6AF.9060709 at gmail.com> <4C34C8AF.70507 at gmail.com> <152f839bbd02f83fc03a5318462443d7.squirrel at brunians.org> <4C34D82D.5070500 at gmail.com> <4C34DA51.8040901 at gmail.com> <4C34ED71.2020108 at gmail.com> <4C34EDED.3070502 at gmail.com> <DB46B940-E4FD-4BE0-8DDD-0E11013AA2C6 at liftingfaces.com> <4C34F29D.3080805 at gmail.com> <4C34F794.8040104 at gmail.com> Message-ID: <4C350A74.3050306 at gmail.com> James Wynn wrote (07-07-2010 22:54): > On 7/7/2010 4:33 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote: >> Whereas you've done the reverse: you think everything in the stpry >> must serve some purpose, yet speculation is free to roam. > > I think his point was "Inire is repeatedly compared to a monkey. This > comes up several times with other characters. Are these flags that Inire > is or has been in other guises. If not, what does Wolfe's repeated use > of these simian signifiers mean? Why do they occur repeatedly?" > > I don't know if he's on to something or not. But saying "I don't see how > this changes anything" is just not an answer. A lot times, you don't > know a plot element changes anything until a good while after you've > accepted it as true. I'm positing it as true - say, Rudesind is Inire. And I'm asking 'and now what?'. And I'm not getting an answer. As to the significance of the simian signifiers, it could of course be that wherever they're present we're dealing with an agent of Inire. Never disputed that. Though I find it a wild stretch. Or maybe they tell us more about the characters' idea of monkeys than of the beings being characterised.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net