The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned byRudesind

Ryan Dunn · 08 Jul 2010, 12:34 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: ryan at liftingfaces.com (Ryan Dunn)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 08:34:09 -0400
Subject: (urth) The mystery of the image of an astronaut
	cleaned	byRudesind
In-Reply-To: <4C35C1CC.5080700 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W256DB5C8585628C8109423CFB30 at phx.gbl>
	<520E36C4-BC0B-4DFE-8F64-BC9EB1D9BF4C at liftingfaces.com>
	<4C34A1F4.6030501 at gmail.com>
	<F7C7A8D7-66C9-4746-9662-C742E53311FE at liftingfaces.com>
	<AANLkTilkfznBstbta55hgfGmNqnPuJiBaxTBg1nk4CNf at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C34C6AF.9060709 at gmail.com> <4C34C8AF.70507 at gmail.com>
	<152f839bbd02f83fc03a5318462443d7.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<4C34D82D.5070500 at gmail.com> <4C34DA51.8040901 at gmail.com>
	<4C34ED71.2020108 at gmail.com> <4C34EDED.3070502 at gmail.com>
	<4C34EF25.7030109 at gmail.com> <4C34F4E3.9020109 at gmail.com>
	<CE561AAB-21F2-499F-B49A-4F53EA6F441B at liftingfaces.com>
	<AANLkTilycxXW-LhpDPTxDpHDWeoeJ2KcSN_epXSqmVsj at mail.gmail.com>
	<011001cb1e42$e4e6d900$08cf4a0c@rclackey>
	<AANLkTikxcMYPDtgTAAP8s5wzWrIQNf-hJmQvvvYEPNXS at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C35580E.2060900 at gmail.com>
	<8E556A92-64FC-49B5-B542-27ECBB7314EA at liftingfaces.com>
	<4C35BF54.8000905 at gmail.com> <4C35C0F5.7090001 at verizon.net>
	<4C35C1CC.5080700 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0A606B66-0274-4778-87EB-B88497FE94DD at liftingfaces.com>

It wasn't my approach. Mine is simpler, and more benign...

I was hoping to glean some insight from this knowledgable group as to my suspicion about a potentially overlooked passage, in an attempt to categorize that insight and use it (or not) to found/confound/expound upon a theory.

...ryan


On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:17 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:

> David Stockhoff wrote (08-07-2010 13:13):
>> That was never the approach.
> 
> I didn't say it was your David's approach.
> 
>> The approach was to try to explain the
>> passage in a way that added significance, that justified itself.
>> 
>> Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>>> Ryan Dunn wrote (08-07-2010 06:01):
>>> 
>>>> It is the same with my assertion that he told us Agia's skull hit the
>>>> stone with the sound of a hammer, despite her full head of hair.
>>>> That, to
>>>> me, was not just colorful description. It was a clue about the nature of
>>>> her skull, and thus HER, and thus her affect on Severian, and thus her
>>>> effect on his journey, and the whole book for that matter.
>>> 
>>> And that's why I think your reducing it to determining at all costs
>>> whether
>>> she is a robot or not is not the correct approach.
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net