The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned byRudesind

António Pedro Marques · 09 Jul 2010, 10:59 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:59:26 +0100
Subject: (urth) The mystery of the image of an
	astronaut	cleaned	byRudesind
In-Reply-To: <604D26F4-1B37-45FD-B6D6-A1BB8C365FE2 at liftingfaces.com>
References: <SNT123-W256DB5C8585628C8109423CFB30 at phx.gbl>	<AANLkTilkfznBstbta55hgfGmNqnPuJiBaxTBg1nk4CNf at mail.gmail.com>	<4C34C6AF.9060709 at gmail.com>
	<4C34C8AF.70507 at gmail.com>	<152f839bbd02f83fc03a5318462443d7.squirrel at brunians.org>	<4C34D82D.5070500 at gmail.com>
	<4C34DA51.8040901 at gmail.com>	<4C34ED71.2020108 at gmail.com>
	<4C34EDED.3070502 at gmail.com>	<4C34EF25.7030109 at gmail.com>
	<4C34F4E3.9020109 at gmail.com>	<CE561AAB-21F2-499F-B49A-4F53EA6F441B at liftingfaces.com>	<AANLkTilycxXW-LhpDPTxDpHDWeoeJ2KcSN_epXSqmVsj at mail.gmail.com>	<011001cb1e42$e4e6d900$08cf4a0c@rclackey>	<AANLkTikxcMYPDtgTAAP8s5wzWrIQNf-hJmQvvvYEPNXS at mail.gmail.com>	<4C35580E.2060900 at gmail.com>	<8E556A92-64FC-49B5-B542-27ECBB7314EA at liftingfaces.com>	<4C35BF54.8000905 at gmail.com>
	<4C35C0F5.7090001 at verizon.net>	<4C35C1CC.5080700 at gmail.com>
	<4C35D092.6010401 at verizon.net>	<2deb6a43eaf13aee3a70d90c35608db7.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<604D26F4-1B37-45FD-B6D6-A1BB8C365FE2 at liftingfaces.com>
Message-ID: <4C37010E.2020804 at gmail.com>

You'll be taken to a cave in Mercury.

Ryan Dunn wrote (08-07-2010 15:51):
> What happens if I agree with both of you? Will I spontaneously combust, or worse?
>
> ...ryan
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:46 AM, brunians at brunians.org wrote:
>
>> The only thing that is certain about David is that he will never be caught
>> dead agreeing with me.
>>
>> He may be perverse enough to agree once or twice starting now that I've
>> mentioned it.
>>
>> I don't know.
>>
>> I don't think so.
>>
>> I could be wrong I suppose.
>>
>> .
>>
>>> OK, but I don't think that was Ryan's approach either. I just like to be
>>> totally sure what people are talking about.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I agree with you generally, and yet I also agree with James, who
>>> is able to put theories out there and let them suffer abuse, and is also
>>> able to consider rival theories.
>>
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net