Monkey business

James Wynn · 09 Jul 2010, 19:35 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:35:07 -0500
Subject: (urth) Monkey business
In-Reply-To: <4C377827.9040507 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W1577B77D5F704FE215BA4BCFB50 at phx.gbl>	<32E5717B-54D0-4BD7-980C-0EB0E5729CAB at liftingfaces.com>	<4C375DFE.5020805 at gmail.com>	<4C37639D.40302 at gmail.com>	<4C3769E5.7060007 at gmail.com>
	<4C377827.9040507 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C3779EB.1070903 at gmail.com>


>
>>
>>>
>>>> On 7/9/2010 12:12 PM, Ryan Dunn wrote:
>>>>> Could the elderly person in Casdoe's house be an aquastor?
>>>>
>>>> James Wynn wrote (09-07-2010 18:35):
>>>> Sure. But anyone...probably any living thing...could be an 
>>>> aquastor. Why
>>>> would being an aquastor help things along?
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2010 12:59 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>>> Hey!
>>
>> James Wynn wrote (09-07-2010 19:26):
>> Bait the hook, then reel them in. You still haven't delineated the
>> relevant differences between "Inire is Rudesind" and "Dorcas is
>> Severian's grandmother".
>
> On 7/9/2010 2:27 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> It's not my fault if you can't read.

Read what? Still no citation? Tsk tsk.
Five dodges now.

>
>> James Wynn wrote (09-07-2010 19:26):
>> So this gives me a chance to show the value of
>> wild speculation.
>> There's no reason to get Talmudic on the difference between your
>> proposed standard and my question. I am only asking "How does viewing
>> the old man as an aquastor resolve the apparent connection between him
>> and Rudesind?" Also, "How does the old man being an aquastor resolve the
>> issue posed by Mr Berman that the old man might be female?"
>> What I am not asking is "What difference would it make if the old man
>> and Rudesind were connected?" or "If the old man is an aquastor, then
>> what?" Because in these instances the question is the answer: "The old
>> man and Rudesind might be connected" and "The old man might be an
>> aquastor".
> On 7/9/2010 2:27 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> If X then X?

Irrelevant question in this case. No speculated advantage. See what I 
did above? I used specific instances and showed how they were different. 
Try that.

> On 7/9/2010 2:27 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> Way to go about not saying anything.

Self-congratulation is unseemly, Antonio.

u+16b9

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net