The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned byRudesind

António Pedro Marques · 09 Jul 2010, 20:04 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:04:08 +0100
Subject: (urth) The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned
	byRudesind
In-Reply-To: <4C373476.2060501 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W256DB5C8585628C8109423CFB30 at phx.gbl>	<520E36C4-BC0B-4DFE-8F64-BC9EB1D9BF4C at liftingfaces.com>	<4C34A1F4.6030501 at gmail.com>	<F7C7A8D7-66C9-4746-9662-C742E53311FE at liftingfaces.com>	<AANLkTilkfznBstbta55hgfGmNqnPuJiBaxTBg1nk4CNf at mail.gmail.com>	<4C34C6AF.9060709 at gmail.com>	<4C34C8AF.70507 at gmail.com>	<152f839bbd02f83fc03a5318462443d7.squirrel at brunians.org>	<4C34D82D.5070500 at gmail.com>	<4C34DA51.8040901 at gmail.com>	<4C34ED71.2020108 at gmail.com>	<4C34EDED.3070502 at gmail.com>	<4C34EF25.7030109 at gmail.com>	<4C34F4E3.9020109 at gmail.com>	<CE561AAB-21F2-499F-B49A-4F53EA6F441B at liftingfaces.com>	<AANLkTilycxXW-LhpDPTxDpHDWeoeJ2KcSN_epXSqmVsj at mail.gmail.com>	<011001cb1e42$e4e6d900$08cf4a0c@rclackey>	<AANLkTikxcMYPDtgTAAP8s5wzWrIQNf-hJmQvvvYEPNXS at mail.gmail.com>	<4C35580E.2060900 at gmail.com>	<4C35BCCD.5030006 at gmail.com>	<4C35C501.6040502 at gmail.com>	<4C370043.2020408 at gmail.com>
	<4C373476.2060501 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C3780B8.9070307 at gmail.com>

James Wynn wrote (09-07-2010 15:38):
>
>>>>> James Wynn said: I've made a request of you: Replaced "Rudesind is
>>>>> Inire" with "Doras is Severian's grandmother" and answer the same
>>>>> question. The answer is the same in both instances. You've dodged
>>>>> this challenge repeatedly.
>>>>
>>>> On 7/8/2010 6:55 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote: ?? You've asked it
>>>> ONCE, I've reported you to the endless discussions on that at the time
>>>> it was put forward, and I've explained how it isn't a good analogy.
>>>
>>> James Wynn wrote (08-07-2010 13:30):
>>> ??? Here are the following threads you've responded to on this:
>>>
>>>>> Me: What's the narrative advantage of Dorcas being Severian's
>>>>> grandmother?
>>>>
>>>> On 7/7/2010 4:18 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote: I'm not talking about
>>>> narrative advantage. I'm talking about speculative advantage. And as a
>>>> side note I'm against the idea of narrative advantage. I don't see that
>>>> real life employs it, why should fiction?
>>>
>> On 7/9/2010 5:56 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>> This is 'I've explained how it isn't a good analogy'.
>
> Actually, I'm pretty sure you haven't. Cite the email where you did. And
> it won't count unless you use the words "Dorcas" and "grandmother". If
> you have, I can't understand why you haven't cited it. Perhaps your
> answers are in code.

Can't you even understand quotes now?

Breathe a little, read again, then come back.

> Unless you can properly cite your explanation, you've dodged the
> challenge a FOURTH time.
>
> Incidentally, by your specialized English, explaining "how it isn't a
> good analogy" isn't an "answer". But since I'm pretty sure you haven't
> done this in relation to "How does Dorcas being Severian's grandmother
> provides any 'speculative advantage'? ", that fact is irrelevant.
>
>>> I said:
>>> I remember when the grandmother theory was posed. There was no more
>>> textual evidence for it than this Hairy Inire theory. The only reason
>>> it's not sitting on the "Half-baked Theory" pile today is because Wolfe
>>> uncharacteristically confirmed it to a questioner.
>>
>> On 7/7/2010 6:05 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>> It's probably the only 'puzzle' in the book that everyone gets. The
>> only way
>> it could be more transparent would be if instead of Cas the boatman would
>> have called her Dorcas. It's not like the boatman calls her Fifi.
>
> This "transparent" puzzle was only understood some 20 years after the
> book was published.

Is this an intentional lie or a sign that you're just too uninformed and 
full of yourself to be worth talking to?

> I'm sure you would have been on the list explaining
> it a week after the SotT was published if you had had the opportunity.

You're apparently sure of many things that are wrong.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net