Tzadkiel/Melek Taus

Gerry Quinn · 09 Jul 2010, 20:18 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 21:18:10 +0100
Subject: (urth) Tzadkiel/Melek Taus
References: <SNT123-W12E6B4CF1E9CDBCCE9EB60CFB50 at phx.gbl><A4E50BED5BA84D9EBB1B66865551BCDC@jill>
	<4C378278.8070409 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <242CDA0648A34BB4B17CA3BAE46645BD@jill>


From: "Ant?nio Pedro Marques" <entonio at gmail.com>
> Gerry Quinn wrote (09-07-2010 19:46):

>> Sure, but that is not the point I am getting at. The question I'm asking
>> relates to the Urthly representatives of good. Surely there should be
>> someone - apart from a few witch doctors maybe - standing up for the
>> prevention of the White Fountain, if that's what the Increate wants?
>
> I'm not sure that's what you're getting at, but I've asked some days ago, 
> if Tzadkiel is evil, where are the *good* people opposing the new sun, 
> since the ones that seem to oppose it don't compare favourably with the 
> ones serving it. That to me is the chief problem with the Tzadkiel-is-evil 
> idea.

I must have missed that, but yes, that is what I am getting at.  It seems 
like a structural necessity in the text.

- Gerry Quinn

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net