Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Dorcas (was: The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by Rudesind)

James Wynn · 09 Jul 2010, 21:06 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:06:11 -0500
Subject: (urth) Dorcas (was: The mystery of the image of an astronaut
 cleaned by Rudesind)
In-Reply-To: <4C378197.8040107 at gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTilrQ1e2iotSu2Uc-uUsJPF1rwbndjWSOchjrUY1 at mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTilGlftBM6m70yNZYnV5v61rGR9ahZdtsAwTfxBF at mail.gmail.com>	<4C376EDA.2040408 at gmail.com>	<4C37739F.6050508 at gmail.com>	<4C377B44.7050903 at gmail.com>	<4C378011.7030002 at gmail.com>
	<4C378197.8040107 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C378F43.3070001 at gmail.com>


>
>>
>>>
>>>> James Wynn said:
>>>> I think simian references to Inire and Rudesind are significant, but I
>>>> never paid them much mind before. Now they *do* appear obvious, don't
>>>> they?
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2010 2:40 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>>> But again - what do you mean when you say they're obvious?
>>>
>> James Wynn wrote (09-07-2010 21:01):
>> I mean that they they are *clearly*, almost to the point of
>> self-evidence, intended by the author to signal something. Or as Roy put
>> it today in the initial post of the "Monkey Business" thread:
>
> On 7/9/2010 3:07 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> So you're saying that you didn't notice that they were there before? 
> But your wording suggested you were aware of them. If you were, what 
> has changed? I'm assuming it wasn't Ryan's mentioning them, since you 
> say they are almost self-evident. What then?


Look. English is not your first language. I get that. But you are 
allowing your debility to make an ass of you.
Also, didn't you just chide me for trimming messages for emphasis? Why 
did you drop the quotation from Roy that I offered to further illustrate 
what I was saying?

u+16b9


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net