Is it time to enforce the five post rule?

James Wynn · 09 Jul 2010, 21:23 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:23:08 -0500
Subject: (urth) Is it time to enforce the five post rule?
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikqa3XDgNEhJtJyJXvlX4wNky5QoNIbVh3Deh3D at mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikqa3XDgNEhJtJyJXvlX4wNky5QoNIbVh3Deh3D at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C37933C.2090408 at gmail.com>

The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to 
vote. ~ Babylon 5

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net