Is it time to enforce the five post rule?

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 09 Jul 2010, 21:29 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:29:42 -0700
Subject: (urth) Is it time to enforce the five post rule?
In-Reply-To: <4C37933C.2090408 at gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikqa3XDgNEhJtJyJXvlX4wNky5QoNIbVh3Deh3D at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C37933C.2090408 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinOtVUpOrHLvgzOr7gK7_UKAa2OvXz-pFI-NTDn at mail.gmail.com>

If you're going to cite Koshisms ...

"You have forgotten something."

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:23 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:
> The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. ~
> Babylon 5
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net