Dorcas (was: The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by Rudesind)

James Wynn · 09 Jul 2010, 22:16 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:16:38 -0500
Subject: (urth) Dorcas (was: The mystery of the image of an astronaut
 cleaned by Rudesind)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilDzPvDOwvuNP_V8cXYTXHlU8zNvl-NEfP1Nzd9 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTilDzPvDOwvuNP_V8cXYTXHlU8zNvl-NEfP1Nzd9 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C379FC6.7030907 at gmail.com>

>> James Wynn wrote:
>> The issue is whether Dorcas as Sev's grandmother was
>> explained in terms that made it convincing to all.
>>      
> On 7/9/2010 4:53 PM, Tony Ellis wrote:
> No, the issue in this thread is whether it was explained in terms so
> *un*convincing that you were right to call it 'a half-baked theory' or
> 'only understood 20 years after the book was published'.
>    

No. You misread part of that. I did not call it a half-baked theory. I 
said this:
> The only reason
> it's not sitting on the "Half-baked Theory" pile today is because Wolfe
> uncharacteristically confirmed it to a questioner.
>    

If it was explained in terms at all before the late 90s, I'm unaware of 
it. It's not an issue of it being in "un"convincing terms. Perhaps 
"insufficiently convincing" is accurate, because people can be very hard 
to convince. But in the late 90s, the explanation was carefully detailed 
in a way that many people began nodding their heads in agreement. Still, 
until someone posted that Wolfe had confirmed this (which I believe 
unfortunately occurred  when the archives were broken), alternate 
theories were regularly offered and debated on this list. Now it is 
gospel and the other constructs are beneath the waves as Nessus is 
beneath the oceans of Ushas. It's as though they never happened.

If I've inadvertently dissed you, I apologize.

u+16b9

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net