lots of stuff
António Pedro Marques · 10 Jul 2010, 01:50
· from 2010-July.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 02:50:42 +0100 Subject: (urth) lots of stuff In-Reply-To: <772357.51292.qm at web50708.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <SNT123-W12E6B4CF1E9CDBCCE9EB60CFB50 at phx.gbl><A4E50BED5BA84D9EBB1B66865551BCDC@jill> <4C378278.8070409 at gmail.com> <242CDA0648A34BB4B17CA3BAE46645BD@jill> <772357.51292.qm at web50708.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4C37D1F2.8050604 at gmail.com> Jerry Friedman wrote (09-07-2010 22:31): > (Somebody asked why /Father/ Inire. I still want to know. Why are Latin Rite priests 'fathers'? They're not supposed to be producing children. Maybe someone that old and important in the Commmonwealth should be called Father. But the reason, that I see, is that the whole FI is a title. Inire does not look like a proper name to me. And when people refer to someone of such importance, they don't use proper names. They won't do it for the Autarch - he may be externally referred to by name, but not generally, I think - and they won't do it for the Autarch's vizier. That raises the question - what's the meaning of FI? > And I'm with those > who think he isn't sexually interested in girls, or any humans.) This I think is unknowable. Sex has a way of popping up in those books where you least expect or actually want it.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net