lots of stuff

António Pedro Marques · 12 Jul 2010, 21:47 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:47:28 +0100
Subject: (urth) lots of stuff
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilyQg15odjIRO8b-BLMl3oz7kTytzeeAY0blxQX at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W55C05233F67B511EFB7F50CFB80 at phx.gbl>	<4C3B769D.6020304 at gmail.com>	<EE445A7DBC0E41D9926B368BF16DA2A7@jill>	<AANLkTilNmuX-dWNbLqfVDElxMogKVajBx-gl5Ojuc-OM at mail.gmail.com>	<4C3B7ABC.9020802 at gmail.com>
	<4C3B83F2.1010903 at gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilyQg15odjIRO8b-BLMl3oz7kTytzeeAY0blxQX at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C3B8D70.3040707 at gmail.com>

John Watkins wrote (12-07-2010 22:33):
> All of the speculation and mystery make me consider "Father Inquiry" as
> a possible pun?  (Assuming it's "in-ee-rey" rather than "in-ire-ay" or
> somesuch.)

I suppose the default pronunciation is ['fAT at rI'naI at r]. Does this look like 
something else mistranscribed?

The 'father' part is more or less established, unless 'father' itself is an 
enlgish transalation of a misheard original.

'Inire' itself doesn't seem to offer many possibilities. ['InIri], [I'ni at r], 
[InI'r at I]?

['] stresses the syllable following it
[I] short i
[@] the uh sound in -er
[i] long i
[T] th

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net